Cited by 84Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAging, Health, and Disability

Measuring anxiety in late life: A psychometric examination of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory and Geriatric Anxiety Scale

Gould, Christine E., Segal, Daniel L., Yochim, Brian P., Pachana, Nancy A., Byrne, Gerard J., Beaudreau, Sherry A.·2014·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

We examined the psychometric properties, internal scale reliability and validity, of two geriatric anxiety measures: the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) and Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS). We also determined the extent to which memory ability influenced the psychometric properties of these measures. Older adult participants (N=110; M age=75 years) completed self-report, clinician-rated and diagnostic psychiatric measures and a neuropsychiatric battery. GAI and GAS scores had good internal consistency, adequate reliability, and strong convergent validity. GAI scores had better discriminant validity than GAS scores relative to a health rating. Both measures had strong associations with depression scores. Psychometric properties were decreased in participants with average delayed memory recall compared with those with superior recall. Both measures had good psychometric support, particularly in those with strong memory abilities. Psychometric performance characteristics indicate that the GAI and GAS may be good alternatives to anxiety measures not designed specifically for older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.08.001

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gould, C. E., Segal, D. L., Yochim, B. P., Pachana, N. A., Byrne, G. J., & Beaudreau, S. A.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Beaudreau, Sherry A.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
804-811
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982782535
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
geriatric anxiety, Geriatric Anxiety Inventory, Geriatric Anxiety Scale, psychometric properties, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, memory retrieval, older adults, depression, anxiety assessment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Geriatric Assessment, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review