Cited by 210Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The relationship between adult attachment style and post-traumatic stress symptoms: A meta-analysis

Open access
Woodhouse, Sarah, Ayers, Susan, Field, Andy P.·2015·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that adult attachment plays a role in the development and perseverance of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This meta-analysis aims to synthesise this evidence and investigate the relationship between adult attachment styles and PTSD symptoms. A random-effects model was used to analyse 46 studies (N=9268) across a wide range of traumas. Results revealed a medium association between secure attachment and lower PTSD symptoms (ρˆ=-.27), and a medium association, in the opposite direction, between insecure attachment and higher PTSD symptoms (ρˆ=.26). Attachment categories comprised of high levels of anxiety most strongly related to PTSD symptoms, with fearful attachment displaying the largest association (ρˆ=.44). Dismissing attachment was not significantly associated with PTSD symptoms. The relationship between insecure attachment and PTSD was moderated by type of PTSD measure (interview or questionnaire) and specific attachment category (e.g. secure, fearful). Results have theoretical and clinical significance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.07.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 131 · Cited by 210

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Authors
Woodhouse, S., Ayers, S., & Field, A. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • City, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ayers, Susan
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
35
Pages
103-117
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1831545790
Cited by
210
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
adult attachment, attachment styles, post-traumatic stress disorder, posttraumatic stress symptoms, secure attachment, insecure attachment, fearful attachment, dismissing attachment, attachment anxiety, trauma
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review