Cited by 118Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Long-term effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for youth with anxiety disorders

Open access
Kodal, Arne, Fjermestad, Krister, Bjelland, Ingvar, Gjestad, Rolf, Öst, Lars-Göran, Bjaastad, Jon F., Haugland, Bente S.M., Havik, Odd E. +2 more·2018·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has demonstrated favorable long-term outcomes in youth with anxiety disorders in efficacy trials. However, long-term outcomes of CBT delivered in a community setting are uncertain. This study examined the long-term outcomes of individual (ICBT) and group CBT (GCBT) in youth with anxiety disorders treated in community mental health clinics. A total of 139 youth (mean age at assessment 15.5 years, range 11-21 years) with a principal diagnosis of separation anxiety disorder (SAD), social anxiety disorder (SOP), and/or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were evaluated, on average, 3.9 years post-treatment (range 2.2-5.9 years). Outcomes included loss of all inclusion anxiety diagnoses, loss of the principal anxiety diagnosis and changes in youth- and parent-rated youth anxiety symptoms. At long-term follow-up, there was loss of all inclusion anxiety diagnoses in 53%, loss of the principal anxiety diagnosis in 63% of participants as well as significant reductions in all anxiety symptom measures. No statistical significant differences in outcome were obtained between ICBT and GCBT. Participants with a principal diagnosis of SOP had lower odds for recovery, compared to those with a principal diagnosis of SAD or GAD. In conclusion, outcomes of CBT for youth anxiety disorders delivered in community mental health clinics were improved at nearly 4 years post-treatment, and recovery rates at long-term follow-up were similar to efficacy trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.11.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT, focusing on exposure to feared cues to promote extinction learning, continues to be the most widely used and most strongly validated psychotherapeutic treatment for both youth and adult anxiety disorders.

    “CBT, focusing on exposure to feared cues to promote extinction learning (Craske, Treanor, Conway, Zbozinek, & Vervliet, 2014), continues to be the most widely used and most strongly validated psychotherapeutic treatment for both youth and adult anxiety disorders (Barry, Yeung, & Lau, 2018;Kodal et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 118

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Barrett, P. M. (2005). FRIENDS for life: Group leaders manual for youth. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.
  2. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User's Guide. (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Authors
Kodal, A., Fjermestad, K., Bjelland, I., Gjestad, R., Öst, L.-G., Bjaastad, J. F., Haugland, B. S. M., Havik, O. E., Heiervang, E., & Wergeland, G. J.
Affiliations
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Kodal, Arne
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
53
Pages
58-67
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769445571
Cited by
118
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Western Norway Regional Health Authority (911366, 911253, 911840)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, youth anxiety disorders, long-term outcomes, separation anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, group cognitive behavioral therapy, community mental health centers, recovery rate, post-treatment follow-up
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Anxiety, Separation, Child, Data Collection, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review