Cited by 50Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy for the treatment of perinatal anxiety symptoms: A preliminary meta-analysis

Open access
Maguire, Peta N., Clark, Gavin I., Wootton, Bethany M.·2018·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) is considered the psychological treatment of choice for anxiety disorders in the general population. However the efficacy of CBT for anxiety that occurs during the perinatal period, defined as the period from conception to 12 months post birth, is less understood. Perinatal anxiety is a complex and multifaceted problem that can affect both the pregnant women and the unborn child, as well as the wider family unit. The aim of this study was to synthesize the current empirical status of CBT for perinatal anxiety using a meta-analytic approach. Relevant articles were identified through a search of electronic databases through to June 2018. The search terms used include 'anxiety' or 'phobia' AND 'perinatal' or 'pregnan* or 'postnatal' or 'postpartum' AND 'CBT' or 'cognitive behav* therapy'. Randomized and non-randomized studies were included within the meta-analysis. A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled between-group mean effect size was small at post treatment (k = 7; d = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.08-0.91) favoring the CBT treatments (Q 1 = 30.13, p <.001). Heterogeneity was high (I 2 = 80.09). The pooled within-group mean effect size was large across the treatment groups from pre-treatment to post-treatment when combining all of the studies (i.e., controlled and uncontrolled studies; k = 14; d = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.63-1.17). Heterogeneity was high (I 2 = 88.55). Some preliminary and exploratory moderator analyses were also conducted to inform potential future research in this field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.10.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 50

Authors
Maguire, P. N., Clark, G. I., & Wootton, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of New England (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Maguire, Peta N.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
60
Pages
26-34
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896997289
Cited by
50
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, perinatal anxiety, postpartum anxiety, pregnancy, anxiety disorders, treatment efficacy, psychological intervention, effect size
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Perinatology, Phobic Disorders, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Research Design, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review