Cited by 37Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research Topics

The role of intolerance of uncertainty in current and remitted internalizing and externalizing psychopathology

Correa, Kelly A., Liu, Huiting, Shankman, Stewart A.·2019·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is a putative key, transdiagnostic factor in internalizing psychopathologies. However, it is unclear if elevated levels of IU, as measured by the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale, short form (IUS-12) and its subscales (prospective and inhibitory IU), persist into remission of internalizing psychopathologies (or particular types of internalizing psychopathologies; e.g., fear vs. distress-misery disorders). It is also unknown if IU is specifically characteristic of internalizing (vs. externalizing) psychopathology and whether this relationship is independent of neuroticism/negative affectivity (N/NA). A large community sample (n = 517) completed a diagnostic interview and self-report measures of IU and N/NA. Results indicated that, independent of N/NA, IU was elevated in current fear and distress/misery disorders, but not externalizing disorders. Individuals with remitted fear disorders also displayed significantly elevated levels of IU in comparison to healthy controls after adjusting for levels of N/NA. In terms of subscales, elevated levels of inhibitory IU, and not prospective IU, demonstrated more reliable relationships with internalizing psychopathologies. In summary, IU was more consistently related to fear disorders, demonstrated incremental validity over and above the effects of N/NA, and may be a key, transdiagnostic mechanism in fear disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.01.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 37

Authors
Correa, K. A., Liu, H., & Shankman, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Shankman, Stewart A.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
62
Pages
68-76
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907366883
Cited by
37
References
94
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH098093)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, internalizing psychopathology, externalizing psychopathology, remission, fear disorders, neuroticism, negative affectivity, inhibitory intolerance of uncertainty, transdiagnostic mechanisms, Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Anxiety Disorders, Defense Mechanisms, Depressive Disorder, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Prospective Studies, Psychopathology, Uncertainty, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review