Cited by 4Potassium and Related DisordersPharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Evaluation of a pharmacist-managed electrolyte protocol in outpatients on antiarrhythmic medications

Long III, Victor P., Carnes, Cynthia A., Vecchiet, Jonathan, Houmsse, Mahmoud, Hirsch, Andrea, Snider, Melissa J.·2017·Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-managed treatment protocol in achieving and maintaining serum potassium level ([K+]) in the desired range. Setting Antiarrhythmic Medications Clinic, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, from 2009 to 2013. Practice description Patients are referred for antiarrhythmic monitoring at this pharmacist-run, electrophysiologist-supervised clinic. Each visit includes medication reconciliation for drug interaction identification, patient interview for potential adverse effects or arrhythmia symptoms, patient education, and drug therapy monitoring through ordering and review of objective testing. Practice innovation In 2009, a novel, pharmacist-managed electrolyte protocol was established for less than ideal [K+] found during antiarrhythmic monitoring. The protocol was intended to standardize and improve practice, versus pre-protocol management through separate electrophysiology offices. The protocol was designed to maintain [K+] of 4.0-5.0 mmol/L, and it used dietary advice and magnesium and potassium supplementation to normalize [K+]. Evaluation The performance of the pharmacist-managed electrolyte protocol was evaluated in consecutive patients seen between June 2009 and July 2013 with [K+] less than 4.0 mmol/L. [K+] during initial visit and laboratory tests were scheduled at weekly intervals after intervention until corrected. Maintenance of [K+] was assessed during the next visit to the clinic. Patients whose management involved pre-protocol between October 2008 and May 2009 at the clinic served as controls. Results One-hundred ninety-one encounters were evaluated from the post-protocol (treatment) group and 41 encounters from the pre-protocol (control) group. Desired [K+] was reached in 161 (84%) post-protocol patient encounters, compared with 21 (49%) in the control group (P < 0.01). Median time to target was 14 days (range, 3-203 days) in the treatment group and 146 days (range, 7-285 days) in the control group (P < 0.01). Of 125 encounters that received follow-up in the treatment group, 75% remained at desired [K+]. Conclusion A pharmacist-managed electrolyte protocol, implemented as part of a comprehensive antiarrhythmic monitoring service, effectively achieves and maintains desired [K+].

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.japh.2017.05.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Cohn, 2000, New guidelines for potassium replacement in clinical practice: a contemporary review by the National Council on Potassium in Clinical Practice, Arch Intern Med, 160, 2429, 10.1001/archinte.160.16.2429 · DOI
  2. Gennari, 1998, Hypokalemia, N Engl J Med, 339, 451, 10.1056/NEJM199808133390707 · DOI
  3. Tveskov, 1994, Potassium and magnesium distribution, ECG changes, and ventricular ectopic beats during beta 2-adrenergic stimulation with terbutaline in healthy subjects, Chest, 106, 1654, 10.1378/chest.106.6.1654 · DOI
  4. Nordrehaug, 1985, Circulating catecholamine and potassium concentrations early in acute myocardial infarction: effect of intervention with timolol, Am Heart J, 110, 944, 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90189-9 · DOI
  5. Cohn, 1984, Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure, N Engl J Med, 311, 819, 10.1056/NEJM198409273111303 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Francis, 1989, The relationship of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin system in congestive heart failure, Am Heart J, 118, 642, 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90291-3 · DOI
  7. Caralis, 1984, Potassium and diuretic-induced ventricular arrhythmias in ambulatory hypertensive patients, Miner Electrolyte Metab, 10, 148
  8. Sanguinetti, 1992, Role of external Ca2+ and K+ in gating of cardiac delayed rectifier K+ currents, Pflugers Arch, 420, 180, 10.1007/BF00374988 · DOI
  9. Parham, 2006, Hyperkalemia revisited, Tex Heart Inst J, 33, 40
  10. Yang, 1996, Extracellular potassium modulation of drug block of IKr. Implications for torsade de pointes and reverse use-dependence, Circulation, 93, 407, 10.1161/01.CIR.93.3.407 · DOI
  11. Macdonald, 2004, What is the optimal serum potassium level in cardiovascular patients?, J Am Coll Cardiol, 43, 155, 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.06.021 · DOI
  12. Snider, 2009, Initial experience with antiarrhythmic medication monitoring by clinical pharmacists in an outpatient setting: a retrospective review, Clin Ther, 31, 1209, 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.06.014 · DOI
  13. Snider, 2012, Cost-benefit and cost-savings analyses of antiarrhythmic medication monitoring, Am J Health Syst Pharm, 69, 1569, 10.2146/ajhp110270 · DOI
  14. Colilla, 2013, Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population, Am J Cardiol, 112, 1142, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.063 · DOI
  15. January, 2014, 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society, Circulation, 130, e199, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000041 · DOI
  16. Deering, 2010, A Heart Rhythm Society Electrophysiology Workforce study: current survey analysis of physician workforce trends, Heart Rhythm, 7, 1346, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.07.026 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Long III, V. P., Carnes, C. A., Vecchiet, J., Houmsse, M., Hirsch, A., & Snider, M. J.
Corresponding author
Snider, Melissa J.
Venue
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
526-531
ISSN
1544-3191 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612813276
Cited by
4
References
17
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Pharmacists Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Potassium and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
serum potassium, hypokalemia, antiarrhythmic drugs, therapeutic drug monitoring, magnesium supplementation, potassium supplementation, dietary recommendations, medication reconciliation, outpatients
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Electrolytes, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ohio, Outpatients, Pharmaceutical Services, Pharmacists, Retrospective Studies, Drug Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review