The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of probiotics in aquatic world: Potential effects, the current status in Egypt and recent prospectives
Open accessAbstract
The increase in the human population in addition to the massive demand for protein of animal origin forced the authorities to seek for additional sources of feed supplies. Aquaculture is the world worth coming expansion to compensate the shortage in animal protein. Feed in aquaculture plays an important role in the production cycle and exert threshold on both practical and economic aspects. Feed additive sectors are expanding day after day to achieve better growth and health for fish and shrimp and to meet the potential requirements of the culturists. Probiotic proved its successes in human and animal feeding practices and recently gained attention in aquaculture; it has beneficial effects in diseases control and competes with various environmental stressors as well as to promote the growth of the cultured organisms. Probiotics have the privilege to manipulate the non-specific innate immunity among fishes, hence help them into resist many pathogenic agents and are actively used worldwide. The present review is an informative compilation of the probiotics, their mode of action and their useful effects on fishes. The review also highlights the status of probiotics in aquaculture of Egypt, probiotic recent prospective for the possible role of probiotics in fish external and internal environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation.
Cleveland, J., Montville, T. J., Nes, I. F., & Chikindas, M. L. (2001) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00560-8 · Cited by 1,835
Hemarajata, P., & Versalovic, J. (2013) · Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1177/1756283x12459294 · Cited by 1,083
Probiotics in marine larviculture
Vine, N. G., Leukes, W. D., & Kaiser, H. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00017.x · Cited by 436
Olsen, A. I., Olsen, Y., Attramadal, Y., Christie, K., Birkbeck, T. H., Skjermo, J., & Vadstein, O. (2000) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(00)00396-3 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Yukgehnaish, K., Kumar, P., Sivachandran, P., Marimuthu, K., Arshad, A., Paray, B. A., & Arockiaraj, J. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12416 · Cited by 470
Camacho, F., Macedo, A., & Malcata, F. (2019) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md17060312 · Cited by 409
Host-Associated Probiotics: A Key Factor in Sustainable Aquaculture
Van Doan, H., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ringø, E., Ángeles Esteban, M., Dadar, M., Dawood, M. A. O., & Faggio, C. (2020) · Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · doi:10.1080/23308249.2019.1643288 · Cited by 348
Cornejo-Granados, F., Lopez-Zavala, A. A., Gallardo-Becerra, L., Mendoza-Vargas, A., Sánchez, F., Vichido, R., Brieba, L. G., Viana, M. T., Sotelo-Mundo, R. R., & Ochoa-Leyva, A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11805-w · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Ibrahem, M. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 765-791
- ISSN
- 2090-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 2090-1232
- OpenAlex
- W2047886187
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of probiotics in aquatic world: Potential effects, the current status in Egypt and recent prospectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jare.2013.12.004
- The paper
- Ibrahem, M. D. (2015). Evolution of probiotics in aquatic world: Potential effects, the current status in Egypt and recent prospectives. Journal of Advanced Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2013.12.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.