How are wetlands and biological interactions related to carnivore distributions at high altitude?
Abstract
Determining the geographic range of species is a main objective in ecology and has implications for conservation. Key determinants of carnivore distribution in dry environments are competition and the availability of water. Here, we gathered and mapped the available information on carnivore habitat quality in the high Andes and Puna in the extreme north of Argentina. We investigated four carnivore species: the Andean cat (Leopardus jacobita), the Pampas cat (Leopardus colocolo), the cougar (Puma concolor) and the culpeo fox (Lycalopex culpaeus). We assessed the main determinants of their distribution, testing explicitly for the effects of seasonal and temporal wetlands and biological interactions. We used species distribution models, and created biophysical models using environmental and landscape variables. Then, by including the four species' biophysical models into the model of the focal species, we tested for the importance of biological interactions. Wetlands were most important for the culpeo fox, most likely because it uses aquatic birds as prey. The cougar was the least restricted species in this arid environment, perhaps due to its large home range. In general, environmental variables, distances to wetlands and the annual range of temperature defined species’ distributions better than did biological interactions. Only the distribution of the Andean cat, a specialized species, was influenced by biological interactions with the Pampas cat.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The high Andean wetlands allow the ranges of these species to straddle the arid mountain landscapes.
“The high Andean wetlands allow the ranges of these species to straddle the arid mountain landscapes”
From The arid Andean plateau waterscapes and the lithium triangle: flamingos as flagships for conservation of high-altitude wetlands under pressure from mining development (2022) · cites this paper as Cuyckens et al. 2015
Distance to wetlands was found to determine the distribution of several of these species, most importantly for the culpeo fox.
“distance to wetlands was found to determine the distribution of several of these species, most importantly for the culpeo fox”
From The arid Andean plateau waterscapes and the lithium triangle: flamingos as flagships for conservation of high-altitude wetlands under pressure from mining development (2022) · cites this paper as Cuyckens et al. 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Cuyckens, G. A. E., Perovic, P. G., & Cristobal, L.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Administración de Parques Nacionales (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Cuyckens, G.A.E.
- Venue
- Journal of Arid Environments
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 115
- Pages
- 14-18
- ISSN
- 0140-1963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038120355
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Arid Environments (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Geographic Society
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- carnivore distribution, wetlands, species interactions, interspecific competition, high Andes, Puna, Andean cat, pampas cat, Leopardus colocolo, Puma concolor, culpeo fox, Lycalopex culpaeus, habitat quality, species distribution modeling, biophysical model, arid regions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review