Cited by 11Species Distribution and Climate ChangeWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

How are wetlands and biological interactions related to carnivore distributions at high altitude?

Cuyckens, G.A.E., Perovic, P.G., Cristobal, L.·2015·Journal of Arid Environments

Abstract

Determining the geographic range of species is a main objective in ecology and has implications for conservation. Key determinants of carnivore distribution in dry environments are competition and the availability of water. Here, we gathered and mapped the available information on carnivore habitat quality in the high Andes and Puna in the extreme north of Argentina. We investigated four carnivore species: the Andean cat (Leopardus jacobita), the Pampas cat (Leopardus colocolo), the cougar (Puma concolor) and the culpeo fox (Lycalopex culpaeus). We assessed the main determinants of their distribution, testing explicitly for the effects of seasonal and temporal wetlands and biological interactions. We used species distribution models, and created biophysical models using environmental and landscape variables. Then, by including the four species' biophysical models into the model of the focal species, we tested for the importance of biological interactions. Wetlands were most important for the culpeo fox, most likely because it uses aquatic birds as prey. The cougar was the least restricted species in this arid environment, perhaps due to its large home range. In general, environmental variables, distances to wetlands and the annual range of temperature defined species’ distributions better than did biological interactions. Only the distribution of the Andean cat, a specialized species, was influenced by biological interactions with the Pampas cat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.12.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 11

Authors
Cuyckens, G. A. E., Perovic, P. G., & Cristobal, L.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Administración de Parques Nacionales (AR)
Corresponding author
Cuyckens, G.A.E.
Venue
Journal of Arid Environments
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
115
Pages
14-18
ISSN
0140-1963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038120355
Cited by
11
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Arid Environments (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Geographic Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
carnivore distribution, wetlands, species interactions, interspecific competition, high Andes, Puna, Andean cat, pampas cat, Leopardus colocolo, Puma concolor, culpeo fox, Lycalopex culpaeus, habitat quality, species distribution modeling, biophysical model, arid regions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review