Cited by 14Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and Cortisol

Reducing the consequences of acute stress on memory retrieval.

Smith, Amy M., Thomas, Ayanna K.·2018·Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Abstract

Psychological stress has been shown to impair episodic memory retrieval. Implicated in this memory impairment is the physiological stress response, which interferes with retrieval-related neural processing. An important next step in research is to determine how to improve post-stress memory accessibility. In this review, we first consider methodological differences in studies that have examined stress and memory, as they lend insight into the conditions under which stress does and does not impede retrieval. Motivated by these variations in methodology, we advocate for two potential approaches to intervention. One approach is to employ evidence-based techniques that reduce the physiological stress response. A second approach is to target the processes that occur during initial learning to promote the formation of highly accessible memories. Thus, this review serves to both critically evaluate the methods used to examine the effects of stress on memory retrieval and encourage research on interventions for stress-related memory impairment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retrieval practice may protect memory against the negative effects of stress.

    “Evidence suggests retrieval practice can protect memory against the negative effects of stress on memory (Agarwal et al., 2014; Smith & Thomas, 2018)”

    From Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Smith & Thomas, 2018

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 14

Authors
Smith, A. M., & Thomas, A. K.
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Published
2018-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
219-229
ISSN
  • 2211-3681 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-369X
OpenAlex
W2779928338
Cited by
14
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
acute stress, episodic memory retrieval, stress and memory, physiological stress response, memory accessibility, stress reduction intervention, memory consolidation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review