Reducing the consequences of acute stress on memory retrieval.
Abstract
Psychological stress has been shown to impair episodic memory retrieval. Implicated in this memory impairment is the physiological stress response, which interferes with retrieval-related neural processing. An important next step in research is to determine how to improve post-stress memory accessibility. In this review, we first consider methodological differences in studies that have examined stress and memory, as they lend insight into the conditions under which stress does and does not impede retrieval. Motivated by these variations in methodology, we advocate for two potential approaches to intervention. One approach is to employ evidence-based techniques that reduce the physiological stress response. A second approach is to target the processes that occur during initial learning to promote the formation of highly accessible memories. Thus, this review serves to both critically evaluate the methods used to examine the effects of stress on memory retrieval and encourage research on interventions for stress-related memory impairment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retrieval practice may protect memory against the negative effects of stress.
“Evidence suggests retrieval practice can protect memory against the negative effects of stress on memory (Agarwal et al., 2014; Smith & Thomas, 2018)”
From Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Smith & Thomas, 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Smith, A. M., & Thomas, A. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-229
- ISSN
- 2211-3681 (ISSN-L)
- 2211-369X
- OpenAlex
- W2779928338
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- acute stress, episodic memory retrieval, stress and memory, physiological stress response, memory accessibility, stress reduction intervention, memory consolidation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review