The isolation effect when offloading memory.
Abstract
Offloading is a widespread and vital strategy for remembering. Yet, we lack a deep understanding of the mechanisms involved during the offloading of to-be-remembered information. One hypothesis is that offloading information is associated with a reduced engagement of top-down mnemonic strategies. A resulting prediction is that phenomena not solely by-products of such mechanisms should remain during offloading. We tested this prediction using the isolation effect (when recall is better for distinct items relative to nondistinct items). Participants had to remember lists of items (words) and, in most cases, were told that they could rely on an external store. On one trial, this expectation was violated, and participants had to unexpectedly rely on their internal/biological memory. Consistent with the prediction, results demonstrate a robust isolation effect irrespective of whether individuals could offload. The findings suggest that memory for distinct events is less susceptible to the typical cost of offloading to-be-remembered information.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More distinct items are less strongly negatively impacted by offloading than less distinct items.
“more distinct items are less strongly negatively impacted by offloading than less distinct items.”
From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Kelly and Risko (2019b)
Different types of information are distinctly affected by externalization.
“different types of information are distinctly affected by externalization.”
From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Kelly & Risko, 2019b
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Kelly, M. O., & Risko, E. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 471-480
- ISSN
- 2211-3681 (ISSN-L)
- 2211-369X
- OpenAlex
- W2986495230
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
- Sponsor name not included
- Canada Research Chairs Program
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- memory offloading, isolation effect, external memory aids, expectancy violation, biological memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review