Cited by 22Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaAgricultural and Biological Research

Intensified extraction of valuable compounds from clove buds using ultrasound assisted hydrotropic extraction

Ghule, Snehal N., Desai, Meghal A.·2021·Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jarmap.2021.100325

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghule, S. N., & Desai, M. A.
Affiliations
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat (IN)
Corresponding author
Desai, Meghal A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
25
Pages
100325
ISSN
2214-7861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3172877496
Cited by
22
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
Keywords
clove buds, eugenol, eugenol acetate, essential oil extraction, hydrotropes, extraction optimization, mass transfer, green extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review