Archaeometric analysis of the “Jehoash Inscription” tablet
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Definitive archaeological evidence of the actual building constructed by Solomon has not yet been identified and published.
“definitive archaeological evidence of the actual building constructed by Solomon has not yet been identified and published”
From Temple Dedication and Construction Texts of the Ancient Near East with Elapsed Years: Implications for Long Duration Chronologies (2024) · cites this paper as Ilani et al. 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Ilani, S., Rosenfeld, A., Feldman, H. R., Krumbein, W. E., & Kronfeld, J.
- Affiliations
- Geological Survey of Israel (IL)
- American Museum of Natural History (US)
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Feldman, H.R.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2966-2972
- ISSN
- 0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057831275
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Building materials and conservation
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- First Temple period, Hebrew inscriptions, arkosic sandstone, patina, microfossils, radiocarbon dating, thermal events, authenticity, accelerator mass spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review