Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The design of effective and efficient trial trenching strategies for discovering archaeological sites

Verhagen, Philip, Borsboom, Arno·2009·Journal of Archaeological Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2009.04.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More ephemeral phenomena, like burial grounds, off-site features, and lithic scatters, are underrepresented in most surveys.

    “More ephemeral phenomena, like burial grounds, off-site features, and lithic scatters, will be underrepresented in most surveys (see Zeidler 1995;Verhagen 2005;Verhagen and Borsboom 2009).”

    From Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene (2012) · cites this paper as Verhagen and Borsboom 2009

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Kintigh, 1988, The effectiveness of subsurface testing: a simulation approach, American Antiquity, 53, 686, 10.2307/281113 · DOI
  2. Krakker, 1983, Design and evaluation of shovel-test sampling in regional archaeological survey, Journal of Field Archaeology, 10, 469, 10.1179/009346983791504147 · DOI
  3. Nance, 1981, Statistical fact and archaeological faith: two models in small site sampling, Journal of Field Archaeology, 8, 151, 10.1179/009346981791505102 · DOI
  4. Shott, 1989, Shovel-test sampling in archaeological survey: comments on Nance and Ball, and Lightfoot, American Antiquity, 54, 396, 10.2307/281714 · DOI
  5. Stone, 1981, On artifact densities and shovel probes, Current Anthropology, 22, 182, 10.1086/202644 · DOI
  6. Sundstrom, 1993, A simple mathematical procedure for estimating the adequacy of site survey strategies, Journal of Field Archaeology, 20, 91, 10.1179/009346993791974316 · DOI
  7. Verhagen, P., 2005. Prospection Strategies and Archaeological Predictive Modelling. In: van Leusen, M., Kamermans, H. (Eds.), Predictive Modelling for Archaeological Heritage Management: a research agenda. ROB, Amersfoort (Nederlandse Archeologische Rapporten 29), pp. 109–121.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Verhagen, P., & Borsboom, A.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
1807-1815
ISSN
0305-4403
Cited by
16
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review