The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The design of effective and efficient trial trenching strategies for discovering archaeological sites
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More ephemeral phenomena, like burial grounds, off-site features, and lithic scatters, are underrepresented in most surveys.
“More ephemeral phenomena, like burial grounds, off-site features, and lithic scatters, will be underrepresented in most surveys (see Zeidler 1995;Verhagen 2005;Verhagen and Borsboom 2009).”
From Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene (2012) · cites this paper as Verhagen and Borsboom 2009
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Kintigh, 1988, The effectiveness of subsurface testing: a simulation approach, American Antiquity, 53, 686, 10.2307/281113 · DOI
- Krakker, 1983, Design and evaluation of shovel-test sampling in regional archaeological survey, Journal of Field Archaeology, 10, 469, 10.1179/009346983791504147 · DOI
- Nance, 1981, Statistical fact and archaeological faith: two models in small site sampling, Journal of Field Archaeology, 8, 151, 10.1179/009346981791505102 · DOI
- Shott, 1989, Shovel-test sampling in archaeological survey: comments on Nance and Ball, and Lightfoot, American Antiquity, 54, 396, 10.2307/281714 · DOI
- Stone, 1981, On artifact densities and shovel probes, Current Anthropology, 22, 182, 10.1086/202644 · DOI
- Sundstrom, 1993, A simple mathematical procedure for estimating the adequacy of site survey strategies, Journal of Field Archaeology, 20, 91, 10.1179/009346993791974316 · DOI
- Verhagen, P., 2005. Prospection Strategies and Archaeological Predictive Modelling. In: van Leusen, M., Kamermans, H. (Eds.), Predictive Modelling for Archaeological Heritage Management: a research agenda. ROB, Amersfoort (Nederlandse Archeologische Rapporten 29), pp. 109–121.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene
Verhagen, P., & Whitley, T. G. (2012) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-011-9102-7 · Cited by 190
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Verhagen, P., & Borsboom, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1807-1815
- ISSN
- 0305-4403
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review