CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Howiesons Poort and MSA III at Klasies River main site, Cave 1A

Villa, P., Soriano, S., Teyssandier, N., Wurz, S.·2010·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We present the results of a technological analysis of the Howiesons Poort and MSA III lithic artifacts from Cave 1A at Klasies River. We studied most of the debitage and retouched pieces from Deacon's excavations (about 3000 pieces) and all the cores and retouched pieces from three layers of Singer and Wymer excavations (640 pieces). Our analysis shows: (1) that HP blade production was based on the use of marginal percussion by soft stone hammer, as at Rose Cottage; (2) that impact scars at Klasies, Rose Cottage and Sibudu indicate that the backed pieces were hafted in two different ways; and (3) that the HP backed pieces were an innovative way of hafting spear tips but are not clear evidence of the invention of bows and arrows. We document the gradual evolution of debitage techniques within the HP sequence with progressive abandonment of the HP technological style. Very similar trends occur in the upper part of the HP sequence at Rose Cottage. The similarity in temporal trends between sites separated by more than 600km has significant implications for the disappearance of the HP industry. We suggest that the disappearance of the HP was not due to a phenomenon of population contraction and isolation that caused the collapse of social networks. The internal evolution and parallel process of change documented at Klasies and Rose Cottage speak against a collapse of social systems and are associated with evidence of environmental and subsistence changes at the transition MIS 4/3.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.028

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 112 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Barkai, 2006, Middle Pleistocene blade production in the Levant: an Amudian assemblage from Qesem Cave, Israel, Eurasian Prehistory, 3, 39
  2. Beaumont, P.B. 1978. Border Cave. MA Thesis, University of Cape Town.
  3. Evans, 1994, Hollow Rock Shelter, A Middle Stone Age site in the Cederberg, S. Afr. Field Archaeol, 3, 63
  4. Geneste, J.M., Plisson, H., 1990. Technologie fonctionnelle des pointes à cran solutréennes: l'apport des nouvelles données de la Grotte de Combe Saunière (Dordogne). In: Kozlowski, J.K. (Ed.), Feuilles de pierre. Les industries à pointes foliacées du Paléolithique supérieur européen. Liège, ERAUL 42, Université de Liège, pp. 293–320.
  5. Johnson, 2009, Cutting edge: a new date for the earliest blade technology. Paper presented at the Paleoanthropology Society Meeting, Paleoanthropology, 2009, A18
  6. Lombard, 2009, The Howieson's Poort of South Africa amplified, South Afr. Arch. Bull., 64, 4
  7. Minichillo, 2005, Middle Stone Age Lithic Study, South Africa: An Examination of Modern Human Origins, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle
  8. Mitchell, 2008, Developing the archaeology of Marine Isotope Stage 3. S. Afr, Archaeol. Soc. Goodwin Volume, 10, 52
  9. Porraz, 2008, Preliminary characterization of a Middle Stone Age lithic assemblage preceding the «classic» Howieson's Poort complex at Diepkloof Rock Shelter, Western Cape province, South Africa), vol. 10, 105
  10. Tomlinson, N.E., 2001. Residue analysis of segments, backed blades and obliquely backed blades from the Howiesons Poort layers of the Middle Stone Age of Rose Cottage Cave, South Africa. M.A. thesis. University of the Witwatersrand.
  11. Tribolo, 2003, Apport des méthodes de la luminescence à la chronologie des technofaciés du Middle Stone Age associés aux premiers Hommes Modernes du Sud de l’Afrique. Doctoral dissertation, University Bordeaux I
  12. Wadley, 1997, Rose Cottage Cave: archaeological work 1987–1997. S. Afr, J. Sci., 93, 439
  13. Wadley, 2008, The Howieson's Poort industry of Sibudu Cave. S. Afr, Archaeol. Soc. Goodwin Volume, 10, 122
  14. Wurz, S. 1997. The Howiesons Poort at Klasies River: from artefacts to cognition. Master Thesis, University of Stellenbosch.
  15. Wurz, 2008, Modern behavior at Klasies River. S. Afr, Archaeol. Soc. Goodwin Volume, 10, 150

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–168 of 168

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Villa, P., Soriano, S., Teyssandier, N., & Wurz, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Iziko Museums of South Africa (ZA)
Corresponding author
Villa, P.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
630-655
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.028
OpenAlex
W2066524166
Cited by
163
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
31.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
Howiesons Poort, lithic technology, technological change, prehistoric hunter-gatherers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review