Investigating the production and distribution of plain ware pottery in the Samoan archipelago with laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on pottery in Sāmoa and Tonga further underlines the limited evidence for the movement of goods between islands.
“Research on pottery in Sāmoa [114] and Tonga [106] further underline the limited evidence for the movement of goods between islands.”
From Dispersal, Isolation, and Interaction in the Islands of Polynesia: A Critical Review of Archaeological and Genetic Evidence (2017) · cites this paper as [114]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Eckert, S. L., & James, W. D.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eckert, Suzanne L.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2155-2170
- ISSN
- 0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972253839
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wenner-Gren Foundation
- Texas A and M University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- ceramic provenance, ceramic tiles, clay provenance, pottery distribution, prehistoric interaction, site use, Tutuila Island
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
