Reevaluation of early Holocene chicken domestication in northern China
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early Holocene bird remains from northern China initially claimed to be chickens were shown by reanalysis based on discrete osteomorphological criteria to be pheasants.
“Although early Holocene bird remains from northern China were initially claimed to be chickens (8), a reanalysis of those bones based upon discrete osteomorphological criteria demonstrated that the specimens were derived from pheasants (1, 9).”
From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
Reanalysis of archaeological bones from northern China determined the remains did not belong to chickens.
“In addition, a reanalysis of the archaeological bones determined the remains did not belong to chickens (1, 9).”
From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
Subsequent reevaluations of the galliform remains from northern China, as well as photographs and drawings, demonstrate that they are pheasant bones.
“Regarding northern China, subsequent reevaluations of the galliform remains (1, 9), as well as photographs and drawings, demonstrate that they are pheasant bones (2, 82).”
From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Eda, M., Lu, P., Kikuchi, H., Li, Z., Li, F., & Yuan, J.
- Affiliations
- Hokkaido University (JP)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Eda, Masaki
- Yuan, Jing
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 25-31
- ISSN
- 0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2257622341
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 11.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (21700846, 24700927)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Livestock and Poultry Management
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Keywords
- chicken domestication, chickens, Early Holocene, Neolithic, Early Bronze Age, northern China, Phasianidae, red junglefowl, zooarchaeology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
