Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Significance and context in GIS-based spatial archaeology: A case study from Southeastern North America

Jones, Eric E.·2017·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.009

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hart, 1991, Models of prehistoric site location for the upper Illinois river valley, Ill. Archaeol., 3, 3
  2. Jones, Eric E. 2013, Occupation History of a Late Pre-contact Site in the North Carolina Peidmont. In: Presented at the 2013 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Meetings, Tampa, FL.
  3. Jones, 2015, The settlement ecology of middle-range societies in the western North Carolina Piedmont, AD 1000–1600, N. C. Archaeol., 64, 1
  4. Thomas, 1996, A study of shell beads and their social context in the mississippian period: a case from the Carolina Piedmont and mountains, Southeast. Archaeol., 15, 29

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Jones, E. E.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
84
Pages
54-62
ISSN
0305-4403
DOI
10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.009
Cited by
12
References
35
Language
en
Licence
Funders
National Science Foundation (BCS-1430945)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance and context in GIS-based spatial archaeology: A case study from Southeastern North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.009
The paper
Jones, E. E. (2017). Significance and context in GIS-based spatial archaeology: A case study from Southeastern North America. Journal of Archaeological Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.