Cited by 77Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Prevalence of pseudoresistant hypertension due to inaccurate blood pressure measurement

Open access
Bhatt, Hemal, Siddiqui, Mohammed, Judd, Eric, Oparil, Suzanne, Calhoun, David·2016·Journal of the American Society of Hypertension

Abstract

The prevalence of pseudoresistant hypertension (HTN) due to inaccurate BP measurement remains unknown. Triage BP measurements and measurements obtained at the same clinic visit by trained physicians were compared in consecutive adult patients referred for uncontrolled resistant HTN (RHTN). Triage BP measurements were taken by the clinic staff during normal intake procedures. BP measurements were obtained by trained physicians using the BpTRU (VSM Med Tech Ltd. Coquitlam, Canada) device. The prevalence of uncontrolled RHTN and differences in BP measurements were compared. Of 130 patients with uncontrolled RHTN, 33.1% (n = 43) were falsely identified as having uncontrolled RHTN based on triage BP measurements. The median (inter-quartile range) of differences in systolic BP between pseudoresistant and true resistant groups were 23 (17-33) mm Hg and 13 (6-21) mm Hg, respectively (P = .0001). The median (inter-quartile range) of differences in diastolic BP between the two groups were 12 (7-18) mm Hg and 8 (4-11) mm Hg, respectively (P = .001). Triage BP technique overestimated the prevalence of uncontrolled RHTN in approximately 33% of the patients emphasizing the importance of obtaining accurate BP measurements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jash.2016.03.186

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with resistant hypertension have pseudoresistance rather than true resistant hypertension.

    “Approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with resistant hypertension have pseudoresistance rather than true resistant hypertension. 104,105,108”

    From 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines (2020) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Introduction says pseudoresistance among people with apparent resistant hypertension is estimated to be *as high as* 50%, not that approximately 50% generally have it. The Results report 33.1% attributable to inaccurate blood-pressure measurement in this study's specialty-clinic patients. The claim omits the upper-bound qualifier and presents 50% as a general proportion. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Resistant hypertension affects around 10% of hypertensive individuals.

    “Resistant hypertension affects around 10% of hypertensive individuals”

    From 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines (2020) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Results and Discussion report pseudoresistant hypertension among patients referred for apparent resistant hypertension, not the prevalence of resistant hypertension among all hypertensive individuals. A search for the claimed 10% prevalence found no passage in our copy that addresses it. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 77

Authors
Bhatt, H., Siddiqui, M., Judd, E., Oparil, S., & Calhoun, D.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Bhatt, Hemal
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Hypertension
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
493-499
ISSN
  • 1878-7436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-1711
OpenAlex
W2334117108
Cited by
77
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL113004, T32HL007457)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK102660, P30DK079626)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
resistant hypertension, prevalence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure Determination, Coronary Vasospasm, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Retrospective Studies, Blood Pressure Monitors, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review