Aβ43 levels determine the onset of pathological amyloid deposition
Open accessAbstract
About 2% of Alzheimer's disease (AD) cases have early onset (FAD) and are caused by mutations in either Presenilin s (PSEN1/2) or amyloid-β precursor protein (APP ). PSEN1/2 catalyze production of Aβ peptides of different length from APP. Aβ peptides are the major components of amyloid plaques, a pathological lesion that characterizes AD. Analysis of mechanisms by which PSEN1/2 and APP mutations affect Aβ peptide compositions lead to the implication of the absolute or relative increase in Aβ42 in amyloid-β plaques formation. Here, to elucidate the formation of pathogenic Aβ cocktails leading to amyloid pathology, we utilized FAD rat knock-in models carrying the Swedish APP ( App s allele) and the PSEN1 L435F ( Psen1 LF allele) mutations. To accommodate the differences in the pathogenicity of rodent and human Aβ, these rat models are genetically engineered to express human Aβ species as both the Swedish mutant allele and the WT rat allele (called App h ) have been humanized in the Aβ-coding region. Analysis of the eight possible FAD mutant permutations indicates that the CNS levels of Aβ43, rather than absolute or relative increases in Aβ42, determine the onset of pathological amyloid deposition in FAD knock-in rats. Notably, Aβ43 was found in amyloid plaques in late onset AD and mild cognitive impairment cases, suggesting that the mechanisms initiating amyloid pathology in FAD knock-in rat reflect disease mechanisms driving amyloid pathology in late onset AD. This study helps clarifying the molecular determinants initiating amyloid pathology and supports therapeutic interventions targeting Aβ43 in AD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aβ43 has a high propensity for oligomerization and is a primary determinant of amyloid pathology.
“This observation is particularly noteworthy as Aβ43 has high propensity for oligomerization and is a primary determinant of amyloid pathology [50]”
From Analysis of early effects of human APOE isoforms on Alzheimer’s disease and type III hyperlipoproteinemia pathways using knock-in rat models with humanized APP and APOE (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
The Discussion (page not provided) says CNS Aβ43 levels determine the speed of pathological amyloid deposition in the knock-in rats studied, supporting its importance to amyloid pathology in that setting. The paper discusses oligomerization of human Aβ generally, but the passages do not establish that Aβ43 specifically has a high propensity for oligomerization. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe Apph allele enables the physiological production of human Aβ instead of rodent Aβ from the endogenous rat App gene.
“The Apph allele enables the physiological production of human Aβ instead of rodent Aβ from the endogenous rat App gene [43–49].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [35]Veugelen S. Saito T. Saido T.C. Chávez-Gutiérrez L. De Strooper B. Familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations in presenilin generate amyloidogenic aβ peptide seeds Neuron 90 2016 410 416 27100199
- Authors
- Tambini, M. D., Yin, T., Yesiltepe, M., Breuillaud, L., Zehntner, S. P., d'Abramo, C., Giliberto, L., & D'Adamio, L.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Northwell Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- D'Adamio, Luciano
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 299
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 104868
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10404620
- OpenAlex
- W4378714553
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P30 AG072946)
- National Institute on Aging (R01 AG063407, K99AG065441, R01AG073182, RF1 AG064821)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University (DS9914)
- University of Kentucky
- United States Atomic Energy Commission
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- amyloid-beta 42, Alzheimer's disease, familial Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, amyloid deposition, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, therapeutic target
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Humans, Mutation, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Rats, Presenilin-1, Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review