Literature Based Discovery: Models, methods, and trends
Open accessAbstract
Objectives This paper provides an introduction and overview of literature based discovery (LBD) in the biomedical domain. It introduces the reader to modern and historical LBD models, key system components, evaluation methodologies, and current trends. After completion, the reader will be familiar with the challenges and methodologies of LBD. The reader will be capable of distinguishing between recent LBD systems and publications, and be capable of designing an LBD system for a specific application. Target audience From biomedical researchers curious about LBD, to someone looking to design an LBD system, to an LBD expert trying to catch up on trends in the field. The reader need not be familiar with LBD, but knowledge of biomedical text processing tools is helpful. Scope This paper describes a unifying framework for LBD systems. Within this framework, different models and methods are presented to both distinguish and show overlap between systems. Topics include term and document representation, system components, and an overview of models including co-occurrence models, semantic models, and distributional models. Other topics include uninformative term filtering, term ranking, results display, system evaluation, an overview of the application areas of drug development, drug repurposing, and adverse drug event prediction, and challenges and future directions. A timeline showing contributions to LBD, and a table summarizing the works of several authors is provided. Topics are presented from a high level perspective. References are given if more detailed analysis is required.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- C.B. Ahlers, D. Hristovski, H. Kilicoglu, T.C. Rindflesch, Using the literature- based discovery paradigm to investigate drug mechanisms, in: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium, 2007.
- D. Hristovski, A. Kastrin, B. Peterlin, T.C. Rindflesch, Combining semantic relations and dna microarray data for novel hypotheses generation, in: Linking Literature, Information, and Knowledge for Biology, Springer, 2010, pp. 53-61.
- S.N. Deftereos, C. Andronis, E.J. Friedla, A. Persidis, A. Persidis, Drug repurposing and adverse event prediction using high-throughput literature analysis, Wiley Interdisc. Rev.: Syst. Biol. Med. 3 (3) (2011) 323-334.
- M. Rastegar-Mojarad, R.K. Elayavilli, D. Li, R. Prasad, H. Liu, A new method for prioritizing drug repositioning candidates extracted by literature-based discovery, in: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), IEEE, 2015, pp. 669-674.
- M. Rastegar-Mojarad, R.K. Elayavilli, L. Wang, R. Prasad, H. Liu, Prioritizing adverse drug reaction and drug repositioning candidates generated by literature-based discovery, in: Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, ACM, 2016, pp. 289-296.
- N.C. Baker, Methods in literature-based drug discovery, Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2010.
- R. Banerjee, Y. Choi, G. Piyush, A. Naik, I. Ramakrishnan, Automated suggestion of tests for identifying likelihood of adverse drug events, in: IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, Citeseer, 2014, pp. 170-176.
- J. Mower, D. Subramanian, N. Shang, T. Cohen, Classification-by-analogy: using vector representations of implicit relationships to identify plausibly causal drug/side-effect prediction, in: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium, 2016.
- M.D. Gordon, N.F. Awad, The tip of the iceberg: the quest for innovation at the base of the pyramid, in: Literature-Based Discovery, Springer, 2008, pp. 23-37.
- E. Aamot, Literature-based discovery for oceanographic climate science, in: European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), 2014, pp. 1-10.
- D. Hristovski, A. Kastrin, T.C. Rindflesch, Semantics-based cross-domain collaboration recommendation in the life sciences: preliminary results, in: 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), IEEE, 2015, pp. 805-806.
- S. Thaicharoen, T. Altman, K. Gardiner, K.J. Cios, Discovering relational knowledge from two disjoint sets of literatures using inductive logic programming, in: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, 2009 (CIDM'09), IEEE, 2009, pp. 283-290.
- D. Hristovski, C. Friedman, T.C. Rindflesch, B. Peterlin, Exploiting semantic relations for literature-based discovery, in: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium, 2006.
- A. Fader, S. Soderland, O. Etzioni, Identifying relations for open information extraction, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011, pp. 1535-1545.
- M.-C. De Marneffe, B. MacCartney, C.D. Manning, Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses, in: Proceedings of Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), vol. 6, 2006, pp. 449-454.
- J. Preiss, Seeking informativeness in literature based discovery, ACL 2014, 2014, p. 112.
- D. Hristovski, A. Kastrin, D. Dinevski, R. Thomas, Towards implementing semantic literature-based discovery with a graph databse, in: The Seventh International Conference on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications, 2015.
- M. Symonds, P. Bruza, L. Sitbon, The efficiency of corpus-based distributional models for literature-based discovery on large data sets, in: Proceedings of the Second Australasian Web Conference-vol. 155, Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2014, pp. 49-57.
- T. Cohen, D. Widdows, R. Schvaneveldt, T.C. Rindflesch, Finding schizophrenia's prozac emergent relational similarity in predication space, in: International Symposium on Quantum Interaction, Springer, 2011, pp. 48- 59.
- J. Stegmann, G. Grohmann, Factor analytic approach to transitive text mining using medline descriptors, in: Literature-Based Discovery, Springer, 2008, pp. 115-131.
- R.J. Cole, P.D. Bruza, A bare bones approach to literature-based discovery: an analysis of the raynaud's/fish-oil and migraine-magnesium discoveries in semantic space, in: International Conference on Discovery Science, Springer, 2005, pp. 84-98.
- T. Cohen, R.W. Schvaneveldt, T.C. Rindflesch, Predication-based semantic indexing: permutations as a means to encode predications in semantic space, in: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium, 2009.
- T. Cohen, D. Widdows, T. Rindflesch, Expansion-by-analogy: a vector symbolic approach to semantic search, in: International Symposium on Quantum Interaction, Springer, 2014, pp. 54-66.
- B. Wilkowski, M. Fiszman, C.M. Miller, D. Hristovski, S. Arabandi, G. Rosemblat, T.C. Rindflesch, Graph-based methods for discovery browsing with semantic predications, Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium, vol. 2011, American Medical Informatics Association, 2011, p. 1514.
- T. Cohen, D. Widdows, R.W. Schvaneveldt, T.C. Rindflesch, Logical leaps and quantum connectives: forging paths through predication space, in: AAAI Fall Symposium: Quantum Informatics for Cognitive, Social, and Semantic Processes, 2010.
- J.C. Goodwin, T. Cohen, T. Rindflesch, Discovery by scent: discovery browsing system based on the information foraging theory, in: 2012 IEEE International Conference Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW), IEEE, 2012, pp. 232-239.
- I. Petric ˇ, B. Cestnik, N. Lavrac ˇ, T. Urbanc ˇic ˇ, Bisociative knowledge discovery by literature outlier detection, in: Bisociative Knowledge Discovery, Springer, 2012, pp. 313-324.
- W. Pratt, M. Yetisgen-Yildiz, Litlinker: capturing connections across the biomedical literature, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, ACM, 2003, pp. 105-112.
- X. Hu, X. Zhang, I. Yoo, Y. Zhang, A semantic approach for mining hidden links from complementary and non-interactive biomedical literature, in: SDM, SIAM, 2006, pp. 200-209.
- M. Yetisgen-Yildiz, Litlinker: a system for searching potential discoveries in biomedical literature, in: Proceedings of 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development on Information Retrieval (SIGIR'06) Doctoral Consortium, Seattle, WA, 2006.
- D. Hristovski, S. Dz ˇeroski, B. Peterlin, A. Roz ˇic ´, Supporting discovery in medicine by association rule mining of bibliographic databases, in: European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Springer, 2000, pp. 446-451.
- J.D. Wren, The 'open discovery' challenge, in: Literature-Based Discovery, Springer, 2008, pp. 39-55.
- M.M. Skeels, K. Henning, M.Y. Yildiz, W. Pratt, Interaction design for literature- based discovery, in: CHI'05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2005, pp. 1785-1788.
- M. Weeber, H. Klein, A.R. Aronson, J.G. Mork, L. De Jong-van Den Berg, R. Vos, Text-based discovery in biomedicine: the architecture of the dad-system, in: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium, American Medical Informatics Association, 2000, p. 903.
- T. Urbanc ˇic ˇ, I. Petric ˇ, B. Cestnik, M. Macedoni-Lukšic ˇ, Literature mining: towards better understanding of autism, in: Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe, Springer, 2007, pp. 217-226.
- M. Yetisgen-Yildiz, W. Pratt, Evaluation of literature-based discovery systems, in: Literature-Based Discovery, Springer, 2008, pp. 101-113.
- A. Ahmed, S.M. Alhashmi, A metric for literature-based discovery methodology evaluation, in: 2015 IEEE/ACS 12th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), IEEE, 2015, pp. 1-5.
- J. Preiss, M. Stevenson, The effect of word sense disambiguation accuracy on literature based discovery, in: Proceedings of the ACM Ninth International Workshop on Data and Text Mining in Biomedical Informatics, ACM, 2015. 1-1.
- D. Hristovski, C. Friedman, T.C. Rindflesch, B. Peterlin, Literature-based knowledge discovery using natural language processing, in: Literature-Based Discovery, Springer, 2008, pp. 133-152.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baek, J., Jauhar, S. K., Cucerzan, S., & Hwang, S. J. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.342 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Yager, K. G. (2024) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d4dd00178h · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Henry, S., & McInnes, B. T.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Henry, Sam
- ORCID
- McInnes, Bridget T.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 20-32
- ISSN
- 1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2753199411
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- literature-based discovery, biomedical text mining, semantic models, distributional models, term ranking, drug development, drug repurposing
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Models, Theoretical, Data Mining, Knowledge Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review