Cited by 44Machine Learning in HealthcarePrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataElectronic Health Records Systems

Distributed learning from multiple EHR databases: Contextual embedding models for medical events

Open access
Li, Ziyi, Roberts, Kirk, Jiang, Xiaoqian, Long, Qi·2019·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) data provide promising opportunities to explore personalized treatment regimes and to make clinical predictions. Compared with regular clinical data, EHR data are known for their irregularity and complexity. In addition, analyzing EHR data involves privacy issues and sharing such data is often infeasible among multiple research sites due to regulatory and other hurdles. A recently published work uses contextual embedding models and successfully builds one predictive model for more than seventy common diagnoses. Despite of the high predictive power, the model cannot be generalized to other institutions without sharing data. In this work, a novel method is proposed to learn from multiple databases and build predictive models based on Distributed Noise Contrastive Estimation (Distributed NCE). We use differential privacy to safeguard the intermediary information sharing. The numerical study with a real dataset demonstrates that the proposed method not only can build predictive models in a distributed manner with privacy protection, but also preserve model structure well and achieve comparable prediction accuracy. The proposed methods have been implemented as a stand-alone Python library and the implementation is available on Github (https://github.com/ziyili20/DistributedLearningPredictor) with installation instructions and use-cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103138

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Federated learning can connect EHR data across medical institutions, letting them share experiences rather than data while preserving privacy.

    “Federated learning is a viable method to connect EHR data from medical institutions, allowing them to share their experiences, and not their data, with a guarantee of privacy [9, 25, 34, 45, 65, 82].”

    From Federated Learning for Healthcare Informatics (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Distributed Noise Contrastive Estimation and Privacy Protection sections describe building a model from multiple EHR databases without sharing patient data; sites share a differentially private count table instead. But the Conclusion and Discussion says the experiment used two EHR systems at one institution, not different hospitals, and calls for evaluation across hospitals. The paper describes privacy protection, not an unqualified guarantee of privacy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among 37 studies learning from structured codes, the frequency of a given code was used in 5 studies.

    “Among 37 studies learning from structured codes, the majority (n = 27) generate one-hot vectors for the input data, and the frequency of a given code is used in 5 studies [11,48,58–60].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 44

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Steinbach M, Karypis G, Kumar V A comparison of document clustering techniques In KDD workshop on text mining, vol. 400, 525– 526 (Boston, 2000).

Authors
Li, Z., Roberts, K., Jiang, X., & Long, Q.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
  • Jiang, Xiaoqian
  • Long, Qi
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
92
Pages
103138
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917418342
Cited by
44
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (ME-1310-07058)
  • National Institute of Health (R01HG008802, R01GM114612, R01GM118574, R01GM118609, R01GM124111, R21LM012060, U54HL108460, U01EB023685)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
electronic health records, distributed learning, differential privacy, privacy-preserving data sharing, multi-site data integration, clinical prediction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Computer Communication Networks, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review