Cited by 115Electronic Health Records SystemsInnovation in Digital Healthcare SystemsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

The new European interoperability framework as a facilitator of digital transformation for citizen empowerment

Open access
Kouroubali, Angelina, Katehakis, Dimitrios G.·2019·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Healthcare is a highly regulated domain. Seamless, online access to integrated electronic health records for citizens is still far from becoming a reality. The implementation of personally managed health data systems still needs to overcome several interoperability, usability, ethics, security, and regulatory issues to deliver the envisioned benefits. This paper offers a policy viewpoint on how the new European Interoperability Framework (EIF) may benefit the implementation of eHealth systems for the management of personal health information for citizens. Interoperability facilitates sharing of health and illness experiences, coordinated care and research for citizen empowerment and improved health outcomes. The adoption of principles relevant to core interoperability and generic user needs and expectations, as described in the new EIF, in line with European and national regulations are quite essential for the development of safe and secure patient access services to support mobility. An interoperability framework facilitates the creation of the appropriate context in which personal health record applications can be designed and implemented in support of disease specific solutions, such as chronic non-malignant pain, diabetes and cancer. It is evident that no solution will fit all circumstances. However, the new EIF, when adapted for personally managed health data, provides a useful and relevant framework to facilitate implementation and adoption of personal health record systems within a coordinated care environment. Practical implications of this work relate to the need of multi-disciplinary cooperation and European level compatibility and sustainability of the underlying infrastructures required to support reliable and secure access to and sharing of medical data, as well as the readiness to address continuously evolving functional and non-functional requirements for regional, national, and cross-border settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103166

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data and insights can be shared with members to enhance medication adherence and chronic disease management, resulting in a higher return on investment for health plans.

    “Additionally, the data and insights can be shared with members to enhance medication adherence and chronic disease management, resulting in a higher return on investment for health plans [16].”
  • Healthcare interoperability solutions provide physicians with the information they need to better coordinate care while also lowering patient healthcare costs.

    “In essence, healthcare interoperability solutions provide physicians with the information they need to better coordinate care while also lowering patient healthcare costs—a win–win situation.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 115

Authors
Kouroubali, A., & Katehakis, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
  • FORTH Institute of Computer Science (GR)
Corresponding author
Kouroubali, Angelina
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
94
Pages
103166
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2937493708
Cited by
115
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Center for eHealth Applications and Services
  • Laboratory of Computational Biomedicine of the Institute of Computer Science
  • Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
European Interoperability Framework, personal health records, interoperability, e-health, citizen empowerment, electronic health records, health data sharing, patient data access, care coordination, health data security, health data regulation, chronic non-cancer pain, diabetes mellitus, cancer
MeSH terms
Empowerment, Continuity of Patient Care, Europe, Humans, Systems Integration, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review