Cited by 194Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Readmission prediction using deep learning on electronic health records

Open access
Ashfaq, Awais, Sant’Anna, Anita, Lingman, Markus, Nowaczyk, Sławomir·2019·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Unscheduled 30-day readmissions are a hallmark of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) patients that pose significant health risks and escalate care cost. In order to reduce readmissions and curb the cost of care, it is important to initiate targeted intervention programs for patients at risk of readmission. This requires identifying high-risk patients at the time of discharge from hospital. Here, using real data from over 7500 CHF patients hospitalized between 2012 and 2016 in Sweden, we built and tested a deep learning framework to predict 30-day unscheduled readmission. We present a cost-sensitive formulation of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network using expert features and contextual embedding of clinical concepts. This study targets key elements of an Electronic Health Record (EHR) driven prediction model in a single framework: using both expert and machine derived features, incorporating sequential patterns and addressing the class imbalance problem. We evaluate the contribution of each element towards prediction performance (ROC-AUC, F1-measure) and cost-savings. We show that the model with all key elements achieves higher discrimination ability (AUC: 0.77; F1: 0.51; Cost: 22% of maximum possible savings) outperforming the reduced models in at least two evaluation metrics. Additionally, we present a simple financial analysis to estimate annual savings if targeted interventions are offered to high risk patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103256

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning and deep learning techniques hold great promise in deriving meaningful insights from EHR, which can aid in accurately predicting clinical outcomes, such as mortality and readmission.

    “They hold great promise in deriving meaningful insights from EHR, which can aid in accurately predicting clinical outcomes, such as mortality [13] and readmission [13], [14].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 194

Authors
Ashfaq, A., Sant’Anna, A., Lingman, M., & Nowaczyk, S.
Affiliations
  • Hallands sjukhus Halmstad (SE)
  • Halmstad University (SE)
  • Region Halland (SE)
Corresponding author
Ashfaq, Awais
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
97
Pages
103256
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963650911
Cited by
194
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
congestive heart failure, hospital readmission prediction, 30-day readmission, electronic health records, LSTM neural network, cost-sensitive learning, class imbalance, targeted interventions, healthcare cost reduction
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Expert Systems, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Risk Factors, Sweden, Time Factors, Models, Statistical, Neural Networks, Computer, Cost Savings, Computational Biology, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review