Cited by 34Machine Learning in HealthcareAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksMedical Coding and Health Information

Harmonized representation learning on dynamic EHR graphs

Open access
Lee, Dongha, Jiang, Xiaoqian, Yu, Hwanjo·2020·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

With the rise of deep learning, several recent studies on deep learning-based methods for electronic health records (EHR) successfully address real-world clinical challenges by utilizing effective representations of medical entities. However, existing EHR representation learning methods that focus on only diagnosis codes have limited clinical value, because such structured codes cannot concretely describe patients' medical conditions, and furthermore, some of the codes assigned to patients contain errors and inconsistency; this is one of the well-known caveats in the EHR. To overcome this limitation, in this paper, we fuse more detailed and accurate information in the form of natural language provided by unstructured clinical data sources (i.e., clinical notes). We propose HORDE, a unified graph representation learning framework to embed heterogeneous medical entities into a harmonized space for further downstream analyses as well as robustness to inconsistency in structured codes. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that HORDE significantly improves the performances of conventional clinical tasks such as subsequent code prediction and patient severity classification compared to existing methods, and also show the promising results of a novel EHR analysis about the consistency of each diagnosis code assignment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103426

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some FEMRs have tackled the problem of coded data limitations by combining unstructured EHR data (text) with structured EMR data to boost performance on specific phenotyping and prediction tasks.

    “Some FEMRs have tackled this problem by combining unstructured EHR data (i.e., text) with structured EMR data to boost performance on specific phenotyping and prediction tasks69,70.”

    From The shaky foundations of large language models and foundation models for electronic health records (2023) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Introduction identifies limitations of diagnosis-code-only representations, and the Abstract says HORDE combines clinical notes with structured codes and improves subsequent-code prediction and patient-severity classification. The paper does not report an improvement on a phenotyping task; its mention of phenotyping in the Introduction describes EHR applications generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MRI images can be converted into graphs that GNNs use to classify progression of Alzheimer's Disease.

    “MRI images can be converted into graphs that GNNs are applied to for classifying the progression of Alzheimer’s Disease [195, 196, 197].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [195]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 34

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. M. Abadi, P. Barham, J. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, S. Ghemawat, G. Irving, M. Isard, et al., Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning., in: OSDI, vol. 16, 2016, pp. 265-283.
  2. E. Choi, M.T. Bahadori, A. Schuetz, W.F. Stewart, J. Sun, Doctor ai: Predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks, in: MLHC, 2016, pp. 301-318.
  3. E. Choi, M.T. Bahadori, J. Sun, J. Kulas, A. Schuetz, W. Stewart, Retain: An inter- pretable predictive model for healthcare using reverse time attention mechanism, in: NIPS, 2016, pp. 3504-3512.
  4. M. Defferrard, X. Bresson, P. Vandergheynst, Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering, in: NIPS, 2016, pp. 3844-3852.
  5. W. Hamilton, Z. Ying, J. Leskovec, Inductive representation learning on large graphs, in: NIPS, 2017, pp. 1024-1034.
  6. J. Liu, Z. Zhang, N. Razavian, Deep ehr: Chronic disease prediction using medical notes, in: MLHC, Vol. 85, 2018, pp. 440-464.

Authors
Lee, D., Jiang, X., & Yu, H.
Affiliations
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Yu, Hwanjo
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
106
Pages
103426
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3017527506
Cited by
34
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2016R1E1A1A01942642)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, graph representation learning, heterogeneous graph embedding, clinical notes, unstructured clinical data, Horde
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review