Cited by 532Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint

Freeman, M.A.R., Pinskerova, V.·2005·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

This review describes the anatomy of the articular surfaces and their movement in the normal tibio-femoral joint, together with methods of measurement in volunteers. Forces and soft tissues are excluded. To measure movement, the articular surfaces and natural or inserted movement markers must be imaged by some combination of MRI, CT, RSA or fluoroscopy. With the aid of computer-imaging, the movements can then be related to an anatomy-based co-ordinate system to avoid kinematic cross-talk. Methods of depicting these movements which are understandable to engineers and clinicians are discussed. The shapes of the articular surfaces are reported. They are relevant to landmarks and co-ordinate systems and form a basis for inferring the nature of the movements which take place in the knee. The movements of the condyles are described from hyperextension to full passive flexion. Medially the condyle hardly moves antero-posteriorly from 0 degrees to 120 degrees but the contact area transfers from an anterior pair of tibio-femoral surfaces at 10 degrees to a posterior pair at about 30 degrees . Thus because of the shapes of the bones, the medial contact area moves backwards with flexion to 30 degrees but the condyle does not. Laterally the femoral condyle and the contact area move posteriorly but to a variable extent in the mid-range causing tibial internal rotation to occur with flexion around a medial axis. From 120 degrees to full flexion both condyles roll back onto the posterior ho…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freeman, M. A. R., & Pinskerova, V.
Affiliations
Royal London Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Freeman, M.A.R.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
197-208
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020787851
Cited by
532
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 23
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Keywords
tibiofemoral joint, knee kinematics, femoral condyle, tibial condyle, contact area, joint subluxation, knee flexion, hyperextension, tibial internal rotation, coordinate systems
MeSH terms
Femur, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Knee Joint, Models, Biological, Movement, Tibia, Range of Motion, Articular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review