Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endothelial actin and cell stiffness is modulated by substrate stiffness in 2D and 3D

Open access
Byfield, Fitzroy J., Reen, Rashmeet K., Shentu, Tzu-Pin, Levitan, Irena, Gooch, Keith J.·2009·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

There is a growing appreciation of the profound effects that passive mechanical properties, especially the stiffness of the local environment, can have on cellular functions. Many experiments are conducted in a 2D geometry (i.e., cells grown on top of substrates of varying stiffness), which is a simplification of the 3D environment often experienced by cells in vivo. To determine how matrix dimensionality might modulate the effect of matrix stiffness on actin and cell stiffness, endothelial cells were cultured on top of and within substrates of various stiffnesses. Endothelial cells were cultured within compliant (1.0–1.5 mg/ml, 124±8 to 202±27 Pa) and stiff (3.0 mg/ml, 502±48 Pa) type-I collagen gels. Cells elongated and formed microvascular-like networks in both sets of gels as seen in previous studies. Cells in stiffer gels exhibited more pronounced stress fibers and ~1.5-fold greater staining for actin. As actin is a major determinant of a cell’s mechanical properties, we hypothesized that cells in stiff gels will themselves be stiffer. To test this hypothesis, cells were isolated from the gels and their stiffness was assessed using micropipette aspiration. Cells isolated from relatively compliant gels were 1.9-fold more compliant than cells isolated from relatively stiff gels (p<0.05). Similarly, cells cultured on top of 1700 Pa polyacrylamide gels were 2.0-fold more compliant that those cultured on 9000 Pa (p<0.05). These data demonstrate that extracellular substrate stiffness regulates endothelial stiffness in both three- and two-dimensional environments, though the range of stiffnesses that cells respond to vary significantly in different environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.012

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Byfield, F. J., Reen, R. K., Shentu, T.-P., Levitan, I., & Gooch, K. J.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
1114-1119
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032647105
Cited by
230
References
5
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endothelial actin and cell stiffness is modulated by substrate stiffness in 2D and 3D. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.012
The paper
Byfield, F. J., Reen, R. K., Shentu, T.-P., Levitan, I., & Gooch, K. J. (2009). Endothelial actin and cell stiffness is modulated by substrate stiffness in 2D and 3D. Journal of Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.