Cited by 119Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditionsObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Changes in nasal airflow and heat transfer correlate with symptom improvement after surgery for nasal obstruction

Open access
Kimbell, J.S., Frank, D.O., Laud, Purushottam, Garcia, G.J.M., Rhee, J.S.·2013·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

Surgeries to correct nasal airway obstruction (NAO) often have less than desirable outcomes, partly due to the absence of an objective tool to select the most appropriate surgical approach for each patient. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models can be used to investigate nasal airflow, but variables need to be identified that can detect surgical changes and correlate with patient symptoms. CFD models were constructed from pre- and post-surgery computed tomography scans for 10 NAO patients showing no evidence of nasal cycling. Steady-state inspiratory airflow, nasal resistance, wall shear stress, and heat flux were computed for the main nasal cavity from nostrils to posterior nasal septum both bilaterally and unilaterally. Paired t-tests indicated that all CFD variables were significantly changed by surgery when calculated on the most obstructed side, and that airflow, nasal resistance, and heat flux were significantly changed bilaterally as well. Moderate linear correlations with patient-reported symptoms were found for airflow, heat flux, unilateral allocation of airflow, and unilateral nasal resistance as a fraction of bilateral nasal resistance when calculated on the most obstructed nasal side, suggesting that these variables may be useful for evaluating the efficacy of nasal surgery objectively. Similarity in the strengths of these correlations suggests that patient-reported symptoms may represent a constellation of effects and that these variables should be tracked concurrently during future virtual surgery planning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research has validated that the primary physiological mechanism producing the sensation of ample nasal airflow is activation of trigeminal cool thermoreceptors, specifically TRPM8, by nasal mucosal cooling.

    “Recent research has validated that the primary physiological mechanism that produces the sensation of ample nasal airflow is activation of trigeminal cool thermoreceptors, specifically TRPM8, by nasal mucosal cooling.224-228”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [227]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says mucosal cooling is sensed by nasal thermoreceptors and contributes to perceived nasal patency. It does not identify those receptors as trigeminal or TRPM8, and it calls for future research on the relative contributions of cooling and other variables rather than establishing cooling as the primary mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 119

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. White FM Fluid Mechanics 2008 McGraw-Hill New York, NY

Authors
Kimbell, J. S., Frank, D. O., Laud, P., Garcia, G. J. M., & Rhee, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Kimbell, J.S.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
46
Issue
15
Pages
2634-2643
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988951759
Cited by
119
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB009557, R01EB009557-01S1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
nasal obstruction, nasal surgery, nasal airflow, heat transfer, nasal resistance, wall shear stress, heat flux, patient-reported symptoms, surgical outcome prediction, nasal cavity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Pulmonary Ventilation, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Nasal Obstruction, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review