Cited by 72Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressBioactive Compounds and Antitumor AgentsNigella sativa pharmacological applications

Sulforaphane as anticancer agent: a double-edged sword? Tricky balance between effects on tumor cells and immune cells

Liang, Jie, Hänsch, Gertrud Maria, Hübner, Katrin, Samstag, Yvonne·2019·Advances in Biological Regulation

Abstract

Sulforaphane (SFN) is a naturally occurring isothiocyanate derived from cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli. It has been reported to inhibit the growth of a variety of cancers, such as breast, prostate, colon, skin, lung, gastric or bladder cancer. SFN is supposed to act primarily as an antioxidant due to the activation of the Nrf2-Keap1 signaling pathway. This enhances the activity of phase II detoxifying enzymes and the trapping of free radicals. Finally, SFN induces cell cycle arrest or apoptosis of tumor cells. Here, we discuss effects of SFN on the immune defense system. In contrast to the situation in tumor cells, SFN acts pro-oxidatively in primary human T cells. It increases intracellular ROS levels and decreases GSH, resulting in inhibition of T cell activation and T cell effector functions. Regarding the use of SFN as an "anticancer agent" we conclude that SFN could act as a double-edged sword. On the one hand it reduces carcinogenesis, on the other hand it blocks the T cell-mediated immune response, the latter being important for immune surveillance of tumors. Thus, SFN could also interfere with the successful application of immunotherapy by immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g. CTLA-4 antibodies and PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies) or CAR T cells. Therefore, a combination of SFN with T cell-mediated cancer immunotherapies does not seem advisable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbior.2018.11.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 107 · Cited by 72

Authors
Liang, J., Hänsch, G. M., Hübner, K., & Samstag, Y.
Affiliations
University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Samstag, Yvonne
Venue
Advances in Biological Regulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
71
Pages
79-87
ISSN
2212-4926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901333255
Cited by
72
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Biological Regulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council (201408370079)
  • Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SA393/3-4)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Nigella sativa pharmacological applications
Keywords
sulforaphane, isothiocyanates, cruciferous vegetables, Nrf2/Keap1 pathway, antioxidant activity, phase II enzymes, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, T cell activation, reactive oxygen species, glutathione depletion, tumor surveillance, cancer immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, anticancer agents
MeSH terms
Animals, Glutathione, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Sulfoxides, T-Lymphocytes, Signal Transduction, Reactive Oxygen Species, Isothiocyanates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review