Cited by 596Biofuel production and bioconversionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionCatalysis for Biomass Conversion

Lactic acid production from lignocellulose-derived sugars using lactic acid bacteria: Overview and limits

Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed Ali, Tashiro, Yukihiro, Sonomoto, Kenji·2011·Journal of Biotechnology

Abstract

Lactic acid is an industrially important product with a large and rapidly expanding market due to its attractive and valuable multi-function properties. The economics of lactic acid production by fermentation is dependent on many factors, of which the cost of the raw materials is very significant. It is very expensive when sugars, e.g., glucose, sucrose, starch, etc., are used as the feedstock for lactic acid production. Therefore, lignocellulosic biomass is a promising feedstock for lactic acid production considering its great availability, sustainability, and low cost compared to refined sugars. Despite these advantages, the commercial use of lignocellulose for lactic acid production is still problematic. This review describes the "conventional" processes for producing lactic acid from lignocellulosic materials with lactic acid bacteria. These processes include: pretreatment of the biomass, enzyme hydrolysis to obtain fermentable sugars, fermentation technologies, and separation and purification of lactic acid. In addition, the difficulties associated with using this biomass for lactic acid production are especially introduced and several key properties that should be targeted for low-cost and advanced fermentation processes are pointed out. We also discuss the metabolism of lignocellulose-derived sugars by lactic acid bacteria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLA is considered the most promising biodegradable polymer material on the market.

    “Given the problem of global pollution, focusing on improving the environment is a win–win situation; thus, it is considered the most promising biodegradable polymer material on the market [6,7].”

    From Synthesis and Biological Application of Polylactic Acid (2020) · cites this paper as [7]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 305 · Cited by 596

Authors
Abdel-Rahman, M. A., Tashiro, Y., & Sonomoto, K.
Affiliations
  • Seinan Jo Gakuin University Junior College (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sonomoto, Kenji
Venue
Journal of Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
156
Issue
4
Pages
286-301
ISSN
0168-1656 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086005124
Cited by
596
References
305
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
Keywords
lactic acid production, lactic acid bacteria, lignocellulosic biomass, biomass pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, lactic acid purification, lactate metabolism
MeSH terms
Lignin, Biomass, Lactic Acid, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Lactobacillales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review