Cited by 106Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Emotional variability and sustained arousal during exposure

Culver, Najwa C., Stoyanova, Milena, Craske, Michelle G.·2012·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives In traditional exposure therapy for phobias and anxiety disorders, reduction of fear responding is used as an index of learning. However, recent evidence in animal models suggests that sustained arousal and enhanced fear responding throughout exposure may actually predict better long-term outcomes (Rescorla, 2000). Methods The effects of sustained arousal during exposure were investigated in a clinical analog sample of 59 participants fearful of public speaking. Participants completed exposure with or without the presence of additional excitatory stimuli which were intended to enhance arousal and fear responding throughout exposure. Results Group assignment (exposure versus exposure with additional excitatory stimuli) did not significantly predict outcome at 1-week follow-up testing, as measured physiologically, subjectively, and behaviorally. A set of regression analyses investigating whether any exposure process measures predicted outcome indicated that sustained arousal throughout exposure as well as variability in subjective fear responding throughout exposure (e.g., Kircanski et al., 2011) predicted lower levels of fear at follow-up testing (p Limitations The excitatory stimuli used failed to produce the intended effects. However, some participants did maintain elevated arousal throughout exposure and this predicted better outcomes at 1-week follow-up testing. Conclusions Sustained arousal throughout exposure as well as variability in subjective…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.10.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In public-speaking fear, higher emotional variability during exposure predicted greater fear reduction one week later.

    “Consistent with this view, a study of individuals with public-speaking fear found that those who experienced higher emotional variability during exposure had greater reduction of fear at follow-up one week later (Culver, Stoyanova, & Craske, 2012).”

    From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as Culver, Stoyanova, & Craske, 2012

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 106

Authors
Culver, N. C., Stoyanova, M., & Craske, M. G.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Culver, Najwa C.
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
787-793
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006874565
Cited by
106
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21 MH722 59-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
exposure therapy, emotional variability, public speaking anxiety, phobia treatment, treatment outcome prediction, habituation, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Arousal, Fear, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Speech, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review