When grandiosity and vulnerability collide: Implicit and explicit self-esteem in patients with narcissistic personality disorder
Abstract
Background and objectives Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is characterized by reports of grandiosity including exaggerated illusions of superiority and entitlement (DSM-IV-TR, APA, 2000). Based on clinical theories (e.g., Kernberg, 1975), many researchers argue that high explicit self-esteem in narcissists masks underlying implicit vulnerability (low implicit self-esteem). Conversely, based on social learning theories (i.e., Millon, 1981), people with NPD are characterized by implicit grandiosity (high implicit self-esteem). We test these competing hypotheses in patients diagnosed with NPD.Methods The present study examined implicit self-esteem (using an Implicit Association Test) and explicit self-esteem (using a self-report questionnaire) in patients with NPD in comparison to non-clinical and clinical, non-NPD (Borderline Personality Disorder, BPD) control groups.Results Patients with NPD scored lower on explicit self-esteem than non-clinical controls. In comparison to patients with BPD, NPD patients scored higher on explicit and implicit self-esteem. Moreover, within the group of NPD patients, damaged self-esteem (i.e., low explicit, high implicit) was associated with higher narcissistic psychopathology.Limitations In both clinical groups we included participants seeking psychiatric treatment, which might influence explicit self-esteem. Longitudinal studies are needed to further assess self-esteem stability in NPD patients in comparison to the control groups.Conclusions Our findings are indicative of vulnerable facets in patients with NPD (i.e., low explicit self-esteem). Furthermore, damaged self-esteem is connected to specific psychopathology within the NPD group. Implications for research on NPD are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NPD is associated with low explicit self-esteem; in patients with higher severity, there is both low explicit and high implicit self-esteem, indicating less integration.
“The disorder is associated with low explicit self-esteem; whereas, in patients with higher severity, there is both low explicit and high implicit self-esteem, indicating less integration (30).”
From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Vater, A., Ritter, K., Schröder-Abé, M., Schütz, A., Lammers, C.-H., Bosson, J. K., & Roepke, S.
- Affiliations
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- University of Bamberg (DE)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vater, Aline
- Venue
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-47
- ISSN
- 0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132855614
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- narcissistic personality disorder, implicit self-esteem, explicit self-esteem, grandiosity, vulnerability, borderline personality disorder, Implicit Association Test
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Young Adult, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review