The efficacy of imagery rescripting (IR) for social phobia: A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background and objectives There is a need for brief effective treatment of social phobia and Imagery Rescripting (IR) is a potential candidate. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of IR preceded by cognitive restructuring as a stand-alone brief treatment using a randomized controlled design. Methods Twenty-three individuals with social phobia were randomly assigned to an IR group or to a control group. Participants in the IR group were provided with one session of imagery interviewing and two sessions of cognitive restructuring and Imagery Rescripting. Those in the control group had one session of clinical interviewing and two sessions of supportive therapy. Outcome measures including the Korean version of the social avoidance and distress scale (K-SADS) were administered before and after treatment, and at three-month follow-up. The short version of the Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery and the Traumatic Experience Scale were also administered before treatment. Results Participants in the IR group improved significantly on K-SADS and other outcome measures, compared to the control group. The beneficial effects of IR were maintained at three-month follow-up. It was also found that mental imagery ability and the severity of the traumatic experience did not moderate the outcome of IR. Limitations Further studies are needed to replicate the findings of our study using a large sample. Conclusions The efficacy of IR as a stand-alone brief treatment was demonstrate…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Imagery rescripting successfully changed encapsulated or core beliefs and decreased symptoms of distress and anxiety in SAD.
“These studies found that imagery rescripting successfully changed such beliefs and decreased symptoms of distress and anxiety.”
From Changes in perceived centrality of anxious events following cognitive behavioral therapy for social anxiety disorder and panic disorder (2018) · cites this paper as Lee & Kwon, 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Lee, S. W., & Kwon, J.-H.
- Affiliations
- Korea University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kwon, Jung-Hye
- Venue
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 351-360
- ISSN
- 0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074341209
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- imagery rescripting, social anxiety disorder, cognitive restructuring, brief psychotherapy, traumatic events, treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Imagination, Interview, Psychological, Korea, Male, Memory, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review