Cited by 44Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory Processes and Influences

Can concreteness training buffer against the negative effects of rumination on PTSD? An experimental analogue study

Schaich, Anja, Watkins, Edward R., Ehring, Thomas·2013·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives Trauma-related rumination has been found to be an important maintaining factor for PTSD. On the background of the processing mode account of ruminative thinking, this study tested whether the relationship between rumination and analogue PTSD symptoms can be modified by training participants in a concrete mode of processing.Methods Healthy participants were trained in either an abstract or a concrete style of processing. Afterwards, they watched a stressful film. The interactive effect of training condition and trait rumination on intrusive memories of the film was examined.Results Following abstract training, a positive relationship between trait rumination and intrusive memories of the film emerged. As hypothesized, this relationship disappeared following concrete training.Limitations include the lack of a no-training control group and the analogue paradigm used.Conclusions The study provides preliminary evidence that the relationship between trait rumination and analogue PTSD symptoms can be modified. If replicated in future studies, it may be promising to examine the value of concreteness training for prevention and/or treatment of PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.03.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 44

Authors
Schaich, A., Watkins, E. R., & Ehring, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Ehring, Thomas
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
396-403
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068958876
Cited by
44
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
rumination, post-traumatic stress disorder, intrusive memories, PTSD prevention
MeSH terms
Affect, Arousal, Depression, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Memory, Mental Processes, Motion Pictures, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review