Can concreteness training buffer against the negative effects of rumination on PTSD? An experimental analogue study
Abstract
Background and objectives Trauma-related rumination has been found to be an important maintaining factor for PTSD. On the background of the processing mode account of ruminative thinking, this study tested whether the relationship between rumination and analogue PTSD symptoms can be modified by training participants in a concrete mode of processing.Methods Healthy participants were trained in either an abstract or a concrete style of processing. Afterwards, they watched a stressful film. The interactive effect of training condition and trait rumination on intrusive memories of the film was examined.Results Following abstract training, a positive relationship between trait rumination and intrusive memories of the film emerged. As hypothesized, this relationship disappeared following concrete training.Limitations include the lack of a no-training control group and the analogue paradigm used.Conclusions The study provides preliminary evidence that the relationship between trait rumination and analogue PTSD symptoms can be modified. If replicated in future studies, it may be promising to examine the value of concreteness training for prevention and/or treatment of PTSD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Training a concrete processing style reduced the relationship between trait rumination and intrusive memory frequency.
“reduced the relationship between trait rumination and intrusive memory frequency (Schaich, Watkins, & Ehring, 2013).”
From Intrusive memories of trauma: A target for research bridging cognitive science and its clinical application (2019) · cites this paper as Schaich, Watkins, & Ehring, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Schaich, A., Watkins, E. R., & Ehring, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- University of Münster (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ehring, Thomas
- Venue
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 396-403
- ISSN
- 0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068958876
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- rumination, post-traumatic stress disorder, intrusive memories, PTSD prevention
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Arousal, Depression, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Memory, Mental Processes, Motion Pictures, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review