Cited by 70Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Deontological guilt and obsessive compulsive disorder

Mancini, Francesco, Gangemi, Amelia·2015·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives The emotion of guilt plays a pivotal role in the genesis and maintenance of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). But what kind of guilt do OC patients want to prevent? Several studies suggest the existence of two different types of guilt emotions, namely deontological and altruistic guilt. This research suggests that the former, more than the latter, is involved in OCD. Studies in which people must hypothetically choose between killing one person to save a few (consequentialist choice) or take no action and allow things to take their course (omission choice), have found that the latter is consistent with the "Do not play God" moral principle whereas the former is consistent with altruistic motivations. This paper is aimed at verifying whether both OC patients, with no induction, and nonclinical participants, after the induction of deontological guilt prefer omission more often than a consequentialist option. It is hypothesized that people with OCD will be motivated to avoid feeling deontological guilt and thus will be more likely to opt for omission. Similarly, nonclinical participants who receive a deontological guilt induction will also be more likely to choose omission. Method In two studies participants were given seven scenarios (four moral dilemmas, three control scenarios). Twenty patients with OCD, 20 anxious controls, and 20 healthy participants took part in study 1. In study 2, we recruited 70 healthy participants who were randomly assigned…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.05.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fear of deontological guilt plays a preeminent role in the development of OCD associated with both checking and washing symptoms.

    “Theoretical and empirical contributions have highlighted that it is the fear of deontological guilt that plays a preeminent role in the development of OCD that is associated both with checking and washing symptoms (Mancini & Gangemi, 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mancini, F., & Gangemi, A.
Affiliations
University of Messina (IT)
Corresponding author
Mancini, Francesco
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
49
Issue
Pt B
Pages
157-163
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W829300706
Cited by
70
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, ethical dilemmas, guilt induction, obsessions and compulsions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Choice Behavior, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morale, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, Visual Analog Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review