Influence of perceptual cues and conceptual information on the activation and reduction of claustrophobic fear
Abstract
Background Fear reactions in phobic patients can be activated by specific perceptual cues (C) or by conceptual fear-related information (I). An earlier study with spider phobic participants documented that perceptual stimuli are particularly potent to trigger fear responses. Because fear of spiders is activated by very circumscribed stimuli, we set out to investigate whether another phobia with more contextual fear-elicitation (i.e., a situational phobia) would yield similar patterns. Thus, we investigate the two paths of fear activation (cues vs. information) and fear reduction during exposure in claustrophobic patients.Method Forty-eight claustrophobic patients and 48 healthy control participants were randomly assigned to one of three virtual reality exposure conditions: C, I, or a combination of both (CI). Exposure lasted 5 min and was repeated 4 times. Self-report and physiological reactions were assessed.Results Claustrophobic patients experienced more initial self-reported fear when confronted with fear-relevant perceptual cues than conceptual information, when the perceptual cues were combined with conceptual information there was no significant enhancement. Furthermore, fear habituated more in the perceptual condition. For the physiological parameters, groups differed and in claustrophobic patients heart rate decreased differently in the conditions.Limitations Longer exposure duration and long-term effects of the manipulation were not investigated.Conclusion We found similar patterns in a situational phobia as compared to a specific-cue related phobia (animal type). Thus, once more this highlights the central role of visual cues in phobic fear and the potential of virtual reality for conducting exposure therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perceptual cues produced higher fear activation and greater fear habituation than conceptual cues in claustrophobia and spider phobia.
“Results showed that perceptual cues produced higher fear activation and greater fear habituation.”
From Recent Progress in Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Phobias: A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as [75]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Shiban, Y., Peperkorn, H., Alpers, G. W., Pauli, P., & Mühlberger, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Regensburg (DE)
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Mühlberger, Andreas
- Venue
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 19-26
- ISSN
- 0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2174320427
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
- MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- claustrophobia, phobic fear, perceptual cues, fear extinction, virtual reality exposure therapy, heart rate, spider phobia
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Carbon Dioxide, Concept Formation, Cues, Fear, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Phobic Disorders, Physical Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiration, Saliva, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review