Cited by 42Cultural Differences and ValuesTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Marketing and Social Media

The direct and moderating influences of individual-level cultural values within web engagement: a multi-country analysis of a public information website

Shiu, Edward, Walsh, Gianfranco, Hassan, Louise M., Parry, Sara·2015·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 42

Authors
Shiu, E., Walsh, G., Hassan, L. M., & Parry, S.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
Walsh, Gianfranco
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
534-541
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007717218
Cited by
42
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
individualism, uncertainty avoidance, perceived value, trust, attitude toward website, moderating effect, cross-cultural consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review