Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entrepreneurship during economic crisis: Success factors and paths to failure

Open access
Devece, Carlos, Peris-Ortiz, Marta, Rueda-Armengot, Carlos·2016·Journal of Business Research

Abstract

This paper identifies the combinations of fundamental entrepreneurial factors that drive the growth of new businesses under different economic conditions. Using data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey, the study focuses on two moments in Spain's recent economic cycle: the 2008 economic crisis and the economic boom prior to this downturn. The study presents an application of fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify the basic entrepreneurial characteristics (opportunity recognition and innovation) and drivers of entrepreneurship (necessity vs. opportunity) that increase the likelihood of success for new businesses during these two periods in the economic cycle. Results reveal that necessity-driven entrepreneurship is ineffective during recessions and that innovation and opportunity recognition are more relevant as success factors during periods of recession than during periods of prosperity. Results also show that the entrepreneur's perception of opportunities may be misleading in strong economies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.139

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Devece, C., Peris-Ortiz, M., & Rueda-Armengot, C.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
69
Issue
11
Pages
5366-5370
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2375753897
Cited by
309
References
2
FWCI
27.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.