Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does big data enhance firm innovation competency? The mediating role of data-driven insights

Ghasemaghaei, Maryam, Calic, Goran·2019·Journal of Business Research

Abstract

Abstract Grounded in gestalt insight learning theory and organizational learning theory, we collected data from 280 middle and top-level managers to investigate the impact of each big data characteristic (i.e., data volume, data velocity, data variety, and data veracity) on firm innovation competency (i.e., exploitation competency and exploration competency), mediated through data-driven insight generation (i.e., descriptive insight, predictive insight, and prescriptive insight). Findings show that while data velocity, variety, and veracity enhance data-driven insight generation, data volume does not impact it. Additionally, results of the post hoc analysis indicate that while descriptive and predictive insights improve innovation competency, prescriptive insight does not affect it. These results provide interesting and unique theoretical and practical insights.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.006

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bagozzi, 1982, Theoretical concepts, measurements, and meaning, A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, 2, 5
  2. Biesdorf, 2013, Court D, Willmott P (2013) Big data: What's your plan, McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 40
  3. Chen, 2017, How Lufthansa capitalized on big data for business model renovation, MIS Quarterly Executive, 16, 16
  4. Chowdhury, 2006, Human behavior in the context of training: An overview of the role of learning theories as applied to training and development, Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 7, 1
  5. Davenport, 2012, Data scientist, Harvard Business Review, 90, 70
  6. LaValle, 2011, Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value, MIT Sloan Management Review, 52, 21
  7. Seleim, 2007, Knowledge management and organizational performance in the Egyptian software firms, International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 3, 37

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Ghasemaghaei, M., & Calic, G.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
104
Pages
69-84
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2958784708
Cited by
331
References
102
FWCI
28.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • McMaster University (20008720)
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (20006922)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does big data enhance firm innovation competency? The mediating role of data-driven insights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.006
The paper
Ghasemaghaei, M., & Calic, G. (2019). Does big data enhance firm innovation competency? The mediating role of data-driven insights. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.