The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marketing-to-Millennials: Marketing 4.0, customer satisfaction and purchase intention
Abstract
This study explores the evolution of Marketing 4.0 and empirically examines its impact on customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Marketing 4.0, an upgrade to the previous Marketing 3.0 model, aims to include the influence of brand interaction in the digital age. This study provides an empirical test of this newer model by analyzing all four of its components with customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Using structural equation modeling to analyze 508 prospective real estate first-time homebuyers, this study evaluates the role of the components of Marketing 4.0 in maximizing customer satisfaction and influencing purchase intentions. Findings indicate that brand identity and brand image are significant factors in determining customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Furthermore, the impact of customer satisfaction on purchase intention is highly significant. Unexpectedly, and counter-intuitively, there was not a significant relationship between brand integrity or brand interaction on customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Considering the study’s participants (Gen-Z/Millennial first-time homebuyers) and the international context of the study (the northern Indian real estate market), this study provides important insights into burgeoning international industries and their prime future target market. Furthermore, this study indicates that, a Marketing 4.0 approach that focuses on brand identity and brand image may influence customer satisfaction and, subsequently, increase customers’ purchase intentions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity
Keller, K. L. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700101 · Cited by 14,686
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130 · Cited by 10,418
Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379102800305 · Cited by 5,853
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions
van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510375599 · Cited by 3,536
A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions
Boulding, W., Kalra, A., Staelin, R., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1993) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379303000102 · Cited by 3,416
Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., & Bennett, N. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.3.430 · Cited by 2,923
Cited by
Miao, M., Jalees, T., Zaman, S. I., Khan, S., Hanif, N.-U.-A., & Javed, M. K. (2022) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-03-2021-0221 · Cited by 309
Lecointre-Erickson, D., Adil, S., Daucé, B., & Legohérel, P. (2024) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2021.2016895 · Cited by 24
Yatawara, K. M. B., Sampath, T., Kalupahana, P. L., Rathnayake, S. O., Jayasuriya, N., & Rathnayake, N. (2026) · International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy · doi:10.1108/ijssp-01-2025-0003 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Dash, G., Kiefer, K., & Paul, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 608-620
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093474228
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 97
- FWCI
- 66.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marketing-to-Millennials: Marketing 4.0, customer satisfaction and purchase intention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.016
- The paper
- Dash, G., Kiefer, K., & Paul, J. (2021). Marketing-to-Millennials: Marketing 4.0, customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.