A review of exploratory factor analysis in tourism and hospitality research: Identifying current practices and avenues for improvement
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PCA was considered feasible if the KMO measure was greater than 0.6 and the Bartlett's test of sphericity p-value was less than 0.05.
“PCA was considered feasible if the KMO measure was greater than 0.6 and the Bartlett's test of sphericity p-value was less than 0.05 [41][42][43][44].”
From Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 134
- Authors
- Howard, M. C., & Henderson, J.
- Affiliations
- University of South Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Howard, Matt C.
- ORCID
- Howard, Matt C.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 154
- Pages
- 113328
- ISSN
- 0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4301188085
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 20
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Keywords
- exploratory factor analysis, tourism research, hospitality research, principal component analysis, varimax rotation, oblique rotation, factor retention, secondary loading, common method variance, reporting quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
