CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Concept and validation of the German version of the cognitive fusion questionnaire (CFQ-D)

Open access
China, Claudia, Hansen, Laura B., Gillanders, David T., Benninghoven, Dieter·2018·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.06.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.06.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 26

Authors
China, C., Hansen, L. B., Gillanders, D. T., & Benninghoven, D.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
China, Claudia
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
9
Pages
30-35
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.06.003
OpenAlex
W2807620126
Cited by
26
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universität zu Lübeck (17-052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
cognitive fusion, Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire, German translation, ACT model, psychological flexibility, chronic pain, scale validation, psychometric properties, psychological inflexibility, depression, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review