Machine learning based risk prediction model for asymptomatic individuals who underwent coronary artery calcium score: Comparison with traditional risk prediction approaches
Open accessAbstract
Background Machine learning (ML) is a computer algorithm used to identify patterns for prediction in various tasks, and ML methods have been beneficial for developing prediction models when applied to heterogeneous and large datasets. We aim to examine the prognostic ability of a ML-based prediction algorithm utilizing routine health checkup data to predict all-cause mortality (ACM) compared to established risk prediction approaches. Methods A total 86155 patients with seventy available parameters (35 clinical, 32 laboratory, and 3 coronary artery calcium score [CACS] parameters) were analyzed. ML involved feature selection, splitting data randomly into a training (70%) and test set (30%), and model building with a boosted ensemble algorithm. The developed ML model was validated in a separate cohort of 4915 patients. The performance of ML for predicting ACM was compared with the following models: (i) the Framingham risk score (FRS) + CACS, (ii) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) + CACS, with (iii) logistic regression (LR) model. Results In the derivation dataset, 690 patients died during the median 4.6-year follow-up (interquartile range, 3.0-6.6 years). The AUC value in the ML model was significantly higher than the other models in test set (ML: 0.82, FRS + CACS: 0.70, ASCVD + CACS: 0.74; LR model: 0.79, p Conclusion The prediction algorithm derived by ML methods showed a robust ability to predict ACM and improved reclassification over established conventional ri…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another study reported opportunistic CAC analysis costs under US$100 compared with substantially higher charges for echocardiography.
“another reporting opportunistic CAC analysis costs under US$100 compared with substantially higher charges for echocardiography.52”
From Prognostication and clinical opportunities with AI for coronary artery calcium: a scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 53 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Han, D., Kolli, K. K., Gransar, H., Lee, J. H., Choi, S.-Y., Chun, E. J., Han, H.-W., Park, S. H., Sung, J., Jung, H. O., Min, J. K., & Chang, H.-J.
- Affiliations
- Yonsei University (KR)
- NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
- Samsung Medical Center (KR)
- The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Hyuk-Jae
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-176
- ISSN
- 1876-861X (ISSN-L)
- 1934-5925
- OpenAlex
- W2976674153
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 3.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Keywords
- all-cause mortality prediction, coronary artery calcium score, machine learning, risk prediction model, asymptomatic individuals, health checkups, Framingham risk score, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, reclassification, cardiovascular risk stratification
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Adult, Coronary Artery Disease, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Databases, Factual, Coronary Angiography, Risk Assessment, Republic of Korea, Asymptomatic Diseases, Vascular Calcification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review