Cited by 41Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Machine learning based risk prediction model for asymptomatic individuals who underwent coronary artery calcium score: Comparison with traditional risk prediction approaches

Open access
Han, Donghee, Kolli, Kranthi K., Gransar, Heidi, Lee, Ji Hyun, Choi, Su-Yeon, Chun, Eun Ju, Han, Hae-Won, Park, Sung Hak +4 more·2020·Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Abstract

Background Machine learning (ML) is a computer algorithm used to identify patterns for prediction in various tasks, and ML methods have been beneficial for developing prediction models when applied to heterogeneous and large datasets. We aim to examine the prognostic ability of a ML-based prediction algorithm utilizing routine health checkup data to predict all-cause mortality (ACM) compared to established risk prediction approaches. Methods A total 86155 patients with seventy available parameters (35 clinical, 32 laboratory, and 3 coronary artery calcium score [CACS] parameters) were analyzed. ML involved feature selection, splitting data randomly into a training (70%) and test set (30%), and model building with a boosted ensemble algorithm. The developed ML model was validated in a separate cohort of 4915 patients. The performance of ML for predicting ACM was compared with the following models: (i) the Framingham risk score (FRS) + CACS, (ii) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) + CACS, with (iii) logistic regression (LR) model. Results In the derivation dataset, 690 patients died during the median 4.6-year follow-up (interquartile range, 3.0-6.6 years). The AUC value in the ML model was significantly higher than the other models in test set (ML: 0.82, FRS + CACS: 0.70, ASCVD + CACS: 0.74; LR model: 0.79, p Conclusion The prediction algorithm derived by ML methods showed a robust ability to predict ACM and improved reclassification over established conventional ri…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.09.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 53 · Cited by 41

Authors
Han, D., Kolli, K. K., Gransar, H., Lee, J. H., Choi, S.-Y., Chun, E. J., Han, H.-W., Park, S. H., Sung, J., Jung, H. O., Min, J. K., & Chang, H.-J.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Chang, Hyuk-Jae
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
168-176
ISSN
  • 1876-861X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5925
OpenAlex
W2976674153
Cited by
41
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
all-cause mortality prediction, coronary artery calcium score, machine learning, risk prediction model, asymptomatic individuals, health checkups, Framingham risk score, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, reclassification, cardiovascular risk stratification
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Coronary Artery Disease, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Databases, Factual, Coronary Angiography, Risk Assessment, Republic of Korea, Asymptomatic Diseases, Vascular Calcification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review