Cited by 138Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthHeart rate and cardiovascular health

Effect of Rosuvastatin on Repeat Heart Failure Hospitalizations

Open access
Rogers, Jennifer K., Jhund, Pardeep S., Perez, Ana-Cristina, Böhm, Michael, Cleland, John G., Gullestad, Lars, Kjekshus, John, van Veldhuisen, Dirk J. +4 more·2014·JACC: Heart Failure

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to examine the effect of statin therapy hospitalizations for heart failure (HFH) in patients in the CORONA (Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure) trial.Background HFH is an important, frequently recurrent event. Conventional time-to-first event analyses do not take account repeat events. We used a number of statistical approaches to examine the effect of treatment on first and repeat HFH in the CORONA trial.Methods In the CORONA trial, 5,011 patients ≥60 years of age with chronic New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV systolic heart failure resulting from ischemia were randomized to receive rosuvastatin or placebo. Poisson, Andersen-Gill, and negative binomial methods (NB) were used to analyze the effect of rosuvastatin on HFH, and the NB and a parametric joint frailty model (JF) were used to examine this effect while accounting for the competing risk of cardiovascular (CV) death. Rosuvastatin/placebo rate ratios were calculated, both unadjusted and adjusted.Results A total of 1,291 patients had 1 or more HFH (750 of these had a single HFH only), and there were a total of 2,408 HFHs. The hazard ratio for the conventional time-to-first event analysis for HFH was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82 to 1.02, p = 0.105). In contrast, the NB on repeat hospitalizations gave an unadjusted RR (RR) for HFH of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.99, p = 0.030), adjusted 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.92, p = 0.001), and after including CV death as the last event, adjusted RR of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.94, p = 0.001). The JF gave an adjusted RR of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.92, p = 0.001). Similar results were found in analyses of all CV hospitalizations and all-cause hospitalizations.Conclusions When repeat events were included, rosuvastatin was shown to reduce the risk of HFH by approximately 15% to 20%, equating to approximately 76 fewer admissions per 1,000 patients treated over a median 33 months of follow-up. Including repeat events could increase the ability to detect treatment effects in heart failure trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.12.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 138

Authors
Rogers, J. K., Jhund, P. S., Perez, A.-C., Böhm, M., Cleland, J. G., Gullestad, L., Kjekshus, J., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Wikstrand, J., Wedel, H., McMurray, J. J. V., & Pocock, S. J.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (DE)
  • Hull York Medical School (GB)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Nordic School of Public Health (SE)
Corresponding author
McMurray, John J.V.
Venue
JACC: Heart Failure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
289-297
ISSN
2213-1779 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W183765262
Cited by
138
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American College of Cardiology Foundation
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PDF-2013-06-024, NF-SI-0611-10227)
  • British Heart Foundation
  • University of Glasgow
  • Medical Research Council (MC_EX_G0800814)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
rosuvastatin, heart failure hospitalization, recurrent hospitalization, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, statin therapy, CORONA trial, negative binomial regression, joint frailty model, all-cause hospitalization, ischemic heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, elderly patients, LDL cholesterol lowering
MeSH terms
Rosuvastatin Calcium, Aged, Chronic Disease, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Fluorobenzenes, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Pyrimidines, Recurrence, Sulfonamides, Myocardial Ischemia, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review