Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

INTERMACS Analysis of Stroke During Support With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Open access
Acharya, Deepak, Loyaga-Rendon, Renzo, Morgan, Charity J., Sands, Kara A., Pamboukian, Salpy V., Rajapreyar, Indranee, Holman, William L., Kirklin, James K., Tallaj, José A.·2017·JACC: Heart Failure

Abstract

Objectives We sought to evaluate predictors of stroke on LVAD from data available prior to implantation, and quantify stroke-related morbidity and mortality Background Stroke is a major complication after LVAD. Pre-implant factors that influence stroke are not well understood. Methods We evaluated all patients in the INTERMACS registry who were implanted with continuous-flow LVADs from May 1, 2012 to March 31, 2015. Preoperative risk factors for stroke, and stroke incidence, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Results During the study period, 7112 patients underwent CF LVAD placement. Median follow-up was 9.79 months (range 0.02–34.96 months). Of all patients, 752 (10.57%) had at least one stroke, with an incidence rate of 0.123 strokes per patient-year. 447 (51.38%) strokes were ischemic and 423 (48.62%) were hemorrhagic. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke had worse survival than those with ischemic strokes (30-day survival 45.3% vs. 80.7, p <0.001). Of patients with a first stroke, 13% had a second stroke. Pre-implant predictors of stroke were female gender (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.25–1.82, p <0.001), pre-implant systolic blood pressure (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.01, p = 0.002), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) (HR 3.68, 95% CI 1.60–8.47, p = 0.002), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.46, p = 0.043), and primary cardiac diagnosis (ischemic/other/unknown) (p = 0.040). Conclusion Despite improvements in LVAD technology, stroke-related morbidity and mortality is substantial. Further investigation is necessary to decrease the risk of this devastating complication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.06.014

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Acharya, D., Loyaga-Rendon, R., Morgan, C. J., Sands, K. A., Pamboukian, S. V., Rajapreyar, I., Holman, W. L., Kirklin, J. K., & Tallaj, J. A.
Venue
JACC: Heart Failure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
703-711
ISSN
2213-1779 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756692171
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INTERMACS Analysis of Stroke During Support With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jchf.2017.06.014
The paper
Acharya, D., Loyaga-Rendon, R., Morgan, C. J., Sands, K. A., Pamboukian, S. V., Rajapreyar, I., Holman, W. L., Kirklin, J. K., & Tallaj, J. A. (2017). INTERMACS Analysis of Stroke During Support With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. JACC: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2017.06.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.