Cited by 71Analytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pharmacokinetics of fluoroquinolones in critical care patients: A bio-analytical HPLC method for the simultaneous quantification of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin in human plasma

De Smet, Julie, Boussery, Koen, Colpaert, Kirsten, De Sutter, Peter, De Paepe, Peter, Decruyenaere, Johan, Van Bocxlaer, Jan·2009·Journal of Chromatography B

Abstract

A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with fluorescence detection was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin in human plasma. Sarafloxacin was used as internal standard. Chromatography was carried out using a Waters XBridge C(18) HPLC column and a gradient mobile phase consisting of CH(3)CN/MeOH/0.025M TBA.Cl/TFA (eluent A at 75/25/899/1 (v/v); eluent B at 150/50/799/1 (v/v); both at pH 3.5). Excitation/emission wavelengths were 279/442nm for ciprofloxacin and 290/500nm for ofloxacin, moxifloxacin and internal standard. Prior to chromatography, plasma samples were treated with acetonitrile for protein precipitation, followed by evaporation of the liquid layer and reconstitution in eluent A. The method was validated for the three fluoroquinolones over the clinically relevant concentration range from 0.02 to 7.50mug/ml. The method showed acceptable linearity with correlation coefficients, r(2)>0.995, as well as high precision (RSD% <7% in each case), accuracy (90.4-105.4%) and selectivity. The limit of quantification for the three fluoroquinolones was established at 0.02mug/ml. Ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin were extracted from plasma with a mean recovery of 95%, 86.4% and 94.2%, respectively. During validation, the concentration of the three fluoroquinolones was found to be stable after 3 freeze-thaw cycles and for at least 15h after extraction. This bio-analytical method was finally…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.02.039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Viale, 2003, J. Chemother., 15, 5, 10.1179/joc.2003.15.Supplement-2.5 · DOI
  2. Peyrani, 2008, Infect. Med., 25, 161
  3. Moran, 2006, Emerg. Med., 30, 377, 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.07.009 · DOI
  4. Boucher, 2006, Crit. Care Clin., 22, 255, 10.1016/j.ccc.2006.02.011 · DOI
  5. Zagli, 2008, Fund. Clin. Pharmacol., 22, 493, 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2008.00623.x · DOI
  6. Soy, 2006, Curr. Opin. Crit. Care, 12, 477, 10.1097/01.ccx.0000244130.77365.c2 · DOI
  7. Laban-Djurdjevic, 2006, J. Chromatogr. B, 844, 104, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.07.001 · DOI
  8. Takacsnovak, 1995, J. Liquid Chromatogr., 18, 807, 10.1080/10826079508009274 · DOI
  9. Garcia, 1999, Biomed. Chromatogr., 13, 350, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0801(199908)13:5<350::AID-BMC889>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  10. Idowu, 2004, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 35, 143, 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.01.006 · DOI
  11. Sowinski, 2004, J. Clin. Pharm. Ther., 29, 381, 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2004.00575.x · DOI
  12. Imre, 2003, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 33, 125, 10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00151-1 · DOI
  13. Zotou, 2002, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 28, 559, 10.1016/S0731-7085(01)00689-6 · DOI
  14. Maya, 2001, J. Chromatogr. B, 755, 320, 10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00126-8 · DOI
  15. Ulu, 2007, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 43, 320, 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.11.005 · DOI
  16. Lemoine, 2000, J. Chromatogr. B, 742, 247, 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00166-3 · DOI
  17. Garcia, 2002, Chromatographia, 55, 431, 10.1007/BF02492272 · DOI
  18. Immanuel, 2001, J. Chromatogr. B, 760, 91, 10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00260-2 · DOI
  19. Macek, 1995, J. Chromatogr. B, 673, 316, 10.1016/0378-4347(95)00263-5 · DOI
  20. Samanidou, 2003, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 375, 623, 10.1007/s00216-003-1749-9 · DOI
  21. Chan, 2006, Anal. Biochem., 353, 30, 10.1016/j.ab.2006.03.016 · DOI
  22. Liang, 2002, J. Chromatogr. B, 772, 53, 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00046-6 · DOI
  23. Long, 1983, Anal. Chem., 55, 712A, 10.1021/ac00258a001 · DOI
  24. Montay, 1985, J. Chromatogr., 339, 214, 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)84647-2 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
De Smet, J., Boussery, K., Colpaert, K., De Sutter, P., De Paepe, P., Decruyenaere, J., & Van Bocxlaer, J.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Venue
Journal of Chromatography B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
877
Issue
10
Pages
961-967
ISSN
1570-0232 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980041883
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
fluoroquinolones, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, pharmacokinetics, critically ill patients, simultaneous determination, human plasma, fluorescence detection, HPLC method validation
MeSH terms
Moxifloxacin, Aza Compounds, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Ciprofloxacin, Humans, Quinolines, Ofloxacin, Fluoroquinolones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review