Simultaneous determination of 21 trace perfluoroalkyl substances in fish by isotope dilution ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
Abstract
Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have been identified as emerging environmental contaminants. In this study, an efficient and accurate ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method was developed for simultaneous determination of 21 PFASs in fish. Acetonitrile was used for sample extraction. Solid phase extraction (SPE) by WAX cartridges and then freezing at -30 °C were adopted as cleanup strategies. Strict measurements were performed to control background contamination during the whole procedure. Matrix effects were evaluated by external standard and isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) methods. IDMS can compensate the matrix effects to a large extent. The method detection limits (MDLs) ranged from 2 pg/g to 10 pg/g except for PFBA (120 pg/g). The method quantitation limits (MQLs) ranged from 5 pg/g to 30 pg/g except for PFBA (300 pg/g). The matrix spiked recoveries of three spiked levels were in the range of 79.6%-109%. The intra-day relative standard deviation (RSD) and inter-day RSD were from 0.94% to 13.9% and 0.36% to 11.2% respectively. Two fish tissue reference materials were analyzed by the developed method. The results of reference materials were within the uncertainty of the given value. The quantitative results of IDMS and standard addition (SA) - IDMS were comparable. The developed UHPLC-MS/MS method was applied for PFASs detection in 20 marine fish samples. 9 PFASs were detected in the samples with the ∑9 PFASs concentration range of 0.04 to 2.14 ng/g wet weight (ww).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have improved quantitation results using isotope dilution and matrix-matched calibration curve approaches.
“many studies have improved quantitation results using isotope dilution [83,87,88] and matrix-matched calibration curve approaches [84].”
From Worldwide trends in tracing poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment (2019) · cites this paper as [87]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Gao, Y., Li, X., Li, X., Zhang, Q., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Metrology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Qinghe
- Venue
- Journal of Chromatography B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 1084
- Pages
- 45-52
- ISSN
- 1570-0232 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791791343
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Chromatography B (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Research and Application of the Common Technology of National Quality Infrastructure (2016YFF0201106)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Keywords
- perfluorinated compounds, isotope dilution mass spectrometry, matrix effects, marine fish contamination, solid-phase extraction cleanup, simultaneous determination, emerging contaminants, perfluorobutanoic acid
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Environmental Monitoring, Fishes, Fluorocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models, Seafood, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Limit of Detection, Food Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review