Cited by 75Analytical chemistry methods developmentPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of deep eutectic solvent droplets for analysis of pesticides in farmer urine and plasma by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Jouyban, Abolghasem, Farajzadeh, Mir Ali, Afshar Mogaddam, Mohammad Reza·2019·Journal of Chromatography B

Abstract

A new disperser-less, centrifuge-less, ice-bath less and deep eutectic solvent-based solidification of organic droplets dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction performed in a laboratory-made extraction apparatus coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry has been developed for the analysis of ten pesticides in plasma and urine samples. For this purpose, a glass tube containing a glass membrane filter was fabricated and a new synthesized deep eutectic solvent with density lighter than water was used as an extractant. The extraction solvent was forced to pass through the glass filter under N 2 stream and it was dispersed as the fine droplets in the sample solution. In this step, the analytes were transferred into the droplets. Due to low density of the extractant, it was collected on top of the sample solution without centrifugation. After performing the validation of the method, low limits of detection in the ranges of 2-17 and 4-36 ng L-1 in urine and plasma were obtained, respectively. Extraction recoveries were in the range of 79-97%. Enrichment factors were obtained from 379 to 485 in urine and 158-194 in plasma. Finally, plasma and urine samples of farmers were effectively analyzed using the method.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.06.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 75

Authors
Jouyban, A., Farajzadeh, M. A., & Afshar Mogaddam, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • University of Tabriz (IR)
Venue
Journal of Chromatography B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
1124
Pages
114-121
ISSN
1570-0232 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948678459
Cited by
75
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, deep eutectic solvents, pesticide residues, urine, plasma, sample preparation
MeSH terms
Farmers, Humans, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Pesticides, Plasma, Limit of Detection, Liquid Phase Microextraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review