Effect of organic matter on arsenic removal during coagulation/flocculation treatment
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of organic matter on arsenic removal by coagulation/flocculation on both a model water with low mineral content and a natural water sample. Ferric chloride was used as coagulant at concentrations avoiding the preoxidation step usually required to oxidize As(III) and increase its removal. Arsenic removal was accomplished by combining evaluation of arsenic residual concentrations and speciation analysis with zeta potential measurements. A preliminary study evaluated the influence of coagulant dose, coagulation pH, and organic matter on As(III) and As(V) removal. The main conclusions were: (i) As(III) removal depended on coagulant dose and on the number of sites available on hydroxide surfaces rather than on coagulation pH; (ii) As(V) removal depended on the zeta potential of colloidal suspension and was more influenced than As(III) by coagulation pH and the presence of organic matter; (iii) organic matter removal followed As(V) removal. This allowed determination of adsorption as the main mechanism occurring during As(V) and organic matter removal and supposing precipitation/coprecipitation as an important As(III) removal mechanism. Adsorption on preformed ferric hydroxide flocs experiments allowed then confirmation of these hypotheses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The initial arsenic concentration, pH, natural organic matter, and the presence of anions essentially affect the rate of adsorption of As(V) on TiO2.
“Furthermore, the initial As concentration, pH, natural organic matter (NOM), and the presence of anions essentially affected the rate of adsorption of As(V)on TiO2 [150, 153–155].”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [154]
Cites
Violante, A., Gaudio, S. D., Pigna, M., Ricciardella, M., & Banerjee, D. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es070382+ · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shankar, S., Shanker, U., & Shikha (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/304524 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
“[159] used kaolinite and FeCl 3 as a coagulant/flocculent and they obtained more than 90% and 77% removal of AsV and AsIII, respectively, using 9.”
Method
- Authors
- Pallier, V., Feuillade-Cathalifaud, G., Serpaud, B., & Bollinger, J.-C.
- Affiliations
- PEIRENE (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Feuillade-Cathalifaud, Geneviève
- Venue
- Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 342
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-32
- ISSN
- 0021-9797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992744908
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
- Keywords
- arsenic removal, organic matter, coagulation-flocculation, ferric chloride, arsenite, arsenate, arsenic speciation, zeta potential, coagulation pH, coagulant dosage, adsorption, co-precipitation, drinking water treatment
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Arsenic, Benzopyrans, Colloids, Ferric Compounds, Flocculation, Fresh Water, Humic Substances, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Particle Size, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review