Cited by 154Arsenic contamination and mitigationCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesWater Treatment and Disinfection

Effect of organic matter on arsenic removal during coagulation/flocculation treatment

Pallier, Virginie, Feuillade-Cathalifaud, Geneviève, Serpaud, Bernard, Bollinger, Jean-Claude·2010·Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of organic matter on arsenic removal by coagulation/flocculation on both a model water with low mineral content and a natural water sample. Ferric chloride was used as coagulant at concentrations avoiding the preoxidation step usually required to oxidize As(III) and increase its removal. Arsenic removal was accomplished by combining evaluation of arsenic residual concentrations and speciation analysis with zeta potential measurements. A preliminary study evaluated the influence of coagulant dose, coagulation pH, and organic matter on As(III) and As(V) removal. The main conclusions were: (i) As(III) removal depended on coagulant dose and on the number of sites available on hydroxide surfaces rather than on coagulation pH; (ii) As(V) removal depended on the zeta potential of colloidal suspension and was more influenced than As(III) by coagulation pH and the presence of organic matter; (iii) organic matter removal followed As(V) removal. This allowed determination of adsorption as the main mechanism occurring during As(V) and organic matter removal and supposing precipitation/coprecipitation as an important As(III) removal mechanism. Adsorption on preformed ferric hydroxide flocs experiments allowed then confirmation of these hypotheses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.09.068

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pallier, V., Feuillade-Cathalifaud, G., Serpaud, B., & Bollinger, J.-C.
Affiliations
PEIRENE (FR)
Corresponding author
Feuillade-Cathalifaud, Geneviève
Venue
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
342
Issue
1
Pages
26-32
ISSN
0021-9797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992744908
Cited by
154
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
arsenic removal, organic matter, coagulation-flocculation, ferric chloride, arsenite, arsenate, arsenic speciation, zeta potential, coagulation pH, coagulant dosage, adsorption, co-precipitation, drinking water treatment
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Arsenic, Benzopyrans, Colloids, Ferric Compounds, Flocculation, Fresh Water, Humic Substances, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Particle Size, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review