The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simultaneously efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by Fe-based MOFs
Abstract
Recently, Fe-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted increasing attention and been widely used. To date, however, it is unknown whether they can be employed to degrade tetracycline, one of the most widely used antibiotics. This work therefore aims to provide such support by comparing the performance of three Fe-based MOFs (namely, Fe-MIL-101, Fe-MIL-100, and Fe-MIL-53) in removing tetracycline. Experimental results showed that Fe-MIL-101 exhibited the best performance in tetracycline removal, with 96.6% of tetracycline being removed (initial tetracycline concentration at 50 mg/L) while Fe-MIL-100 and Fe-MIL-53 removed 57.4% and 40.6% under the same conditions. Additionally, the effects of adding dosage, adsorption time, and initial concentration of tetracycline on degradation efficiency were examined. It was found that the adsorption and photocatalytic degradation effect was better with the increase of time, the optimum dosage of Fe-MIL-101 was 0.5 g/L and the removal efficiency decreased with the increasing of initial tetracycline concentrations. Moreover, the trapping experiments and ESR tests indicated that O2-, OH and h+ were the main active species in photocatalytic degradation process of tetracycline. Due to its high removal efficiency and simple synthesis, it could be used as a potential catalyst for degradation of tetracycline and other antibiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The application of different typological and structural MOFs-based materials for the dyes adsorption
Jiang, D., Chen, M., Wang, H., Zeng, G., Huang, D., Cheng, M., Liu, Y., Xue, W., & Wang, Z. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2018.11.002 · Cited by 435
Self-citationLeichtweis, J., Vieira, Y., Welter, N., Silvestri, S., Dotto, G. L., & Carissimi, E. (2022) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2022.01.085 · Cited by 341
Zhang, X., Wang, J., Dong, X.-X., & Lv, Y.-K. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125144 · Cited by 303
Tufail, A., Price, W. E., & Hai, F. I. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127460 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., Jia, F., Wang, H., Chen, F., Fang, Y., Dong, W., Zeng, G., Li, X., Yang, Q., & Yuan, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 519
- Pages
- 273-284
- ISSN
- 0021-9797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793713214
- Cited by
- 802
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simultaneously efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by Fe-based MOFs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.02.067
- The paper
- Wang, D., Jia, F., Wang, H., Chen, F., Fang, Y., Dong, W., Zeng, G., Li, X., Yang, Q., & Yuan, X. (2018). Simultaneously efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by Fe-based MOFs. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.02.067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
