Cited by 38Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFuel Cells and Related Materials

Laser conversion of biomass into porous carbon composite under ambient condition for pH-Universal electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction

Wang, Nan, Bo, Xiangjie, Zhou, Ming·2021·Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Abstract

It is highly desirable to develop durable and advanced electrocatalysts for pH-universal hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). While it makes much progress so far, the development of an environmental-friendly and cost-effective method to upgrade earth-abundant biomass into high value-added products still remains a major challenge. Thermal pyrolysis method which requires high pyrolysis temperature and long synthesis period is considered as a general method for preparation of carbon-based electrocatalysts. In view of this, ruthenium, nitrogen co-doped porous carbon (Ru@CN) is synthesized by laser conversion method at room temperature using cheap and renewable biomass honey as green carbon source. By controlling the loading of Ru and laser power, the electrocatalytic activities of as-prepared electrocatalysts can be adjusted effectively. Because of the advantage of rich Ru 0 and Ru-N sites, the synthesized 0.04-Ru@CN-6 with Ru loading amount of 2.66 wt% exhibits a preferable electrocatalytic activity toward HER under all-pH conditions. Especially in alkaline solution, the optimal 0.04-Ru@CN-6 exhibits a small overpotential (11 mV) at 10 mA cm-2 current density, which is even much better than commercial 20 wt% Pt/C (37 mV). This strategy reported here may be a feasible and unique approach to synthesis and design of high-performance as well as cost-effective all-pH HER electrocatalyst.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.07.057

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, N., Bo, X., & Zhou, M.
Affiliations
Northeast Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Bo, Xiangjie
  • Zhou, Ming
Venue
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
604
Pages
885-893
ISSN
0021-9797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3184687295
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2412020ZD006, JGPY201802)
  • Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project
  • Northeast Normal University
  • Education Department of Jilin Province
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, pH-universal electrocatalysts, biomass-derived carbon, honey, ruthenium, room-temperature synthesis, alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction, platinum-free electrocatalysts
MeSH terms
Carbon, Hydrogen, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lasers, Porosity, Biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review